Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097218›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Climate-resilient strategies for sustainable management of water resources and agriculture.

Arun Lal Srivastav, Rajni Dhyani, Manish Ranjan, Sughosh Madhav, Mika Sillanpää

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Green-Synthesized Nanomaterials for Aflatoxin Mitigation: A Review.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Drought stress mitigation by foliar application of L-carnitine and its effect on radish morphophysiology.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Extreme Climate Shocks and Green Agricultural Development: Evidence from the 2008 Snow Disaster in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arun Lal SrivastavChitkara University School of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India. arun.srivastav@chitkarauniversity.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0238-7395
Rajni DhyaniCSIR-Central Road Research Institute (CSIR-CRRI), New Delhi, India.
Manish RanjanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sughosh MadhavSchool of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Mika SillanpääInstitute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Vietnam. mikaetapiosillanpaa@duytan.edu.vn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Warming of the earth is considered as the major adverse effect of climate change along with other abnormalities such as non-availability of water resources, decreased agriculture production, food security, rise in seawater level, glaciers melting, and loss of biodiversity. Over the years, decreased agriculture production and water quality degradation have been observed due to climatic abnormalities. Crop production is highly sensitive to climate. It gets affected by long-term trends in average rainfall and temperature, annual climate variations, shocks during different stages of growth, and extreme weather events. Globally, the areas sown for the major crops of barley, maize, rice, sorghum, soya bean, and wheat have all seen an increase in the percentage of area affected by drought as defined in terms of the Palmer Drought Severity Index since the 1960s, from approximately 5-10% to approximately 15-25%. Increase in temperature will be observed in terms of wheat yield losses - 5.5 ± 4.4% per degree Celsius for the United States, - 9.1 ± 5.4% per degree Celsius for India, and - 7.8 ± 6.3% per degree Celsius for Russia as these countries are more vulnerable to temperature increase. Water management through increasing storage capacity (or rainwater storage), fair policies for water supply and distribution, river health, and watershed management can reduce the negative effects of climate change on water resource availability. Similarly, climate change-resistant crop development, water management in irrigation, adapting climate-smart agriculture approach, and promoting indigenous knowledge can ensure the food security via increasing agricultural yield. Technical intervention can equip the farmers with the scientific analyses of the climatic parameters required for the sustainable agriculture management. These technologies may include application of software, nutrient management, water management practices, instruments for temperature measurement and soil health analysis etc. Holistic efforts of the stakeholders (farmers, local society, academia, scientists, policy makers, NGOs etc.) can provide better results to reduce the risks of climate change on agriculture and water resources as discussed in this paper. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

AgricultureWater ResourcesClimate ChangeCrops, AgriculturalWater SupplyAgriculture yieldClimate changeForecasting modelsWater resources

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.