Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097132›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Disentangling interoceptive abilities in alexithymia.

Cristina Scarpazza, Andrea Zangrossi, Yu-Chun Huang, Giuseppe Sartori, Sebastiano Massaro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristina ScarpazzaDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, PD, Italy. cristina.scarpazza@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4126-426X
Andrea ZangrossiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani, 5, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Yu-Chun HuangThe Organizational Neuroscience Laboratory, 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, WC1N 3AX, UK.
Giuseppe SartoriDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, PD, Italy.
Sebastiano MassaroThe Organizational Neuroscience Laboratory, 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, WC1N 3AX, UK.
University of Padua · ITUniversity of Surrey · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, research on interoceptive abilities (i.e., sensibility, accuracy, and awareness) and their associations with emotional experience has flourished. Yet interoceptive abilities in alexithymia-a personality trait characterized by a difficulty in the cognitive interpretation of emotional arousal, which impacts emotional experience-remain under-investigated, thereby limiting a full understanding of subjective emotional experience processing. Research has proposed two contrasting explanations thus far: in one model, the dimensions of interoceptive sensibility and accuracy in alexithymia would increase; in the other model, they would decrease. Surprisingly, the contribution of interoceptive awareness has been minimally researched. In this study (N = 182), the relationship between participants' level of alexithymia and the three interoceptive dimensions was tested. Our results show that the higher the level of alexithymia is, the higher interoceptive accuracy and sensibility (R

Indexed as

Affective SymptomsEmotionsArousalDissociative DisordersHumans

Identifiers

PMID34097132
PMCPMC8182733
OpenAlexW3166099152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.