Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097130›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

Effect of hypoxia and nitrate supplementation on different high-intensity interval-training sessions.

A Sousa, J L Viana, J Milheiro, V M Reis, G P Millet

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A SousaResearch Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, University of Trás-Os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal. sousa.acm@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7790-732X
J L VianaResearch Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, University Institute of Maia, ISMAI, Maia, Portugal.
J MilheiroCMEP Exercise Medical Center & SPA, Porto, Portugal.
V M ReisResearch Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, University of Trás-Os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
G P MilletISSUL, Institute of Sport Sciences and Physical Education (ISSEP), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/114670/2Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID04045/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo test the hypothesis that interval-training (IHT) would be impaired by hypoxia to a larger extent than repeated-sprint training (RSH) and that dietary nitrate (NO

methodsThirty endurance-trained male participants performed IHT (6 × 1 min at 90%∆ with 1 min active recovery) and RSH (2 sets of 6 × 10 s "all-out" efforts with 20 s active recovery) on a cycle ergometer, allocated in one of three groups: normobaric hypoxia (~ 13% F

results[Formula: see text]O

conclusionIHT responses were neither more impaired by hypoxia than RSH ones. Moreover, dietary NO

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHypoxiaAdultAthletic PerformanceHumansMaleNitratesOxygen ConsumptionNitratesHIITHRHypoxiaNitrateO2Performance

Identifiers

PMID34097130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.