Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097061›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2021

An Expert Elicitation on the Effects of a Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Cigars in the United States.

David T Levy, Christopher J Cadham, Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero, Marie Knoll, Nargiz Travis, Zhe Yuan, Yameng Li, Ritesh Mistry, Clifford E Douglas, Jamie Tam and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Public Health Impacts of Flavored Cigar Bans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. The Impact of Menthol Cigarette Bans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The Public Health Impact of a Ban on Flavored Cigars: A Decision-Theoretic Policy Framework.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. What Is (Un)Flavored? A Scoping Review of the Conceptualization of Flavored Cigarillos.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A Patchy Prohibition: Product and Flavor Substitution After the Food and Drug Administration's Prioritized Enforcement Policy on Flavored E-cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How Smokers of Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars Might Respond to FDA's Proposed Bans.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  17. Banning Menthol Cigarettes: The Time Has Come.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessing the Health and Economic Impact of a Potential Menthol Cigarette Ban in New York City: a Modeling Study.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

David T LevyDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-3612
Christopher J CadhamDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Luz Maria Sanchez-RomeroDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7951-3965
Marie KnollDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Nargiz TravisDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Zhe YuanDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Yameng LiDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Ritesh MistryDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Clifford E DouglasDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jamie TamSchool of Public Health, Yale University, Hartford, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8353-4259
Aylin SertkayaERG, Lexington, MA, USA.
Kenneth E WarnerDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rafael MezaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-5037

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Mendez Emilien · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
FDA HHSNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe US Food and Drug Administration announced its intention to ban menthol in cigarettes. However, information is needed on how a federal ban would affect population health. AIMS AND

methodsWe conducted an expert elicitation to gauge the impact of a menthol cigarette and cigar ban in the United States. We developed and pilot tested a questionnaire that focused on tobacco use transitions of current smokers (age 18-24 menthol, age 35-54 menthol, and age 35-54 nonmenthol) and potential menthol smokers (age 12-24). Using a structured expert elicitation, we estimated mean net transitions under a ban from cigarette use to combustible tobacco product, smokeless tobacco, novel nicotine delivery product (NNDPs, such as e-cigarettes) use, or no tobacco use.

resultsEleven experts provided responses. Of those ages 12-24 who would have initiated menthol cigarette use in the absence of a ban, the experts estimated that 41% would still initiate combustible products under a ban, while 18% would initiate with NNDPs and 39% would not initiate regular tobacco use. Combustible use by menthol smokers ages 35-54 was expected to decline by 20% postban relative to preban rates, half switching to NNDPs and half quitting all tobacco use. Menthol smokers ages 18-24 were expected to reduce combustible use by 30%, with 16% switching to NNDPs. Greater reductions in combustible use were estimated for African Americans across the three age groups. Negligible impacts were expected for current adult nonmenthol smokers.

conclusionsAccording to expert opinion, a menthol ban is expected to substantially reduce smoking initiation and combustible tobacco product use among current menthol smokers. IMPLICATIONS: The US Food and Drug Administration recently announced its intention to ban menthol in cigarettes, but information on the potential impact on smoking and other nicotine product use is limited. We conducted an expert elicitation to gauge the impact of a menthol cigarette and cigar ban in the United States. A panel of experts estimated that menthol smokers ages 35-54 would reduce combustible tobacco use by 20%, with half switching to e-cigarettes and half quitting all nicotine use. Larger reductions were expected at younger ages, and menthol smoking initiation was reduced by 59% with 18% instead using e-cigarettes. African Americans were expected to have greater reductions in combustible tobacco use than the rest of the population.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultChildHumansMentholMiddle AgedSmokingUnited StatesYoung AdultMenthol

Identifiers

PMID34097061
PMCPMC8496475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.