Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34097017›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2021

Clinical Correlates and Implications of the Reliability of the Frailty Index in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Quoc Dinh Nguyen, Erica M Moodie, Mark R Keezer, Christina Wolfson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reliability of the Frailty Index Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Frailty and Processing Speed Performance at the Cusp of Midlife in CATSLife.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Quoc Dinh NguyenDivision of Geriatrics, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5412-2597
Erica M MoodieDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7225-3977
Mark R KeezerCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Christina WolfsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR LSA 94473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeficit accumulation frailty indices (FIs) are widely used to characterize frailty. FIs vary in number and composition of items; the impact of this variation on reliability and clinical applicability is unknown.

methodWe simulated 12 000 studies using a set of 70 candidate deficits in 12 080 community-dwelling participants 65 years and older. For each study, we varied the number (5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 45) and composition (random selection) of items defining the FI and calculated descriptive and predictive estimates: frailty score, prevalence, frailty cutoff, mortality odds ratio, predicted probability of mortality for FI = 0.28 (prevalence threshold), and FI cutoff predicting 10% mortality over the follow-up. We summarized the estimates' medians and spreads (0.025-0.975 quantiles) by number of items and calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

resultsMedians of frailty scores were 0.11-0.12 with decreasing spreads from 0.04-0.24 to 0.10-0.14 for 5-item and 45-item FIs. The median cutoffs identifying 15% as frail was 0.19-0.20 and stable; the spreads decreased with more items. However, medians and spreads for the prevalence of frailty (median: 11%-3%), mortality odds ratio (median: 1.24-2.19), predicted probability of mortality (median: 8%-17%), and FI cutoff predicting 10% mortality (median: 0.38-0.20) varied markedly. ICC increased from 0.19 (5-item FIs) to 0.84 (45-item FIs).

conclusionsVariability in the number and composition of items of individual FIs strongly influences their reliability. Estimates using FIs may not be sufficiently stable for generalizing results or direct application. We propose avenues to improve the development, reporting, and interpretation of FIs.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedAgingCanadaFrail ElderlyHumansLongitudinal StudiesReproducibility of ResultsCLSAMeasurement errorPsychometricsRegression dilutionReliability

Identifiers

PMID34097017
PMCPMC8514068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.