Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096991›Full record

ArticleJAMA pediatrics2021

Evaluation of Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Outcomes Among US Trauma Centers.

Craig D Newgard, Amber Lin, Lenora M Olson, Jennifer N B Cook, Marianne Gausche-Hill, Nathan Kuppermann, Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert, Susan Malveau, McKenna Smith, Mengtao Dai and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. A Qualitative Needs Assessment for Pediatric Care Partnerships in Community Emergency Departments.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Measuring Pediatric Disaster Readiness of United States Emergency Departments.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pediatric emergency care: Determinants and systematic barriers.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  16. Systems-based care of the injured child: Technical report.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Craig D NewgardCenter for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Amber LinCenter for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Lenora M OlsonNational Emergency Medical Services for Children Data Analysis Resource Center, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Jennifer N B CookCenter for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Marianne Gausche-HillLos Angeles County Emergency Medical Services, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance.
Nathan KuppermannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Jeremy D Goldhaber-FiebertCenters for Health Policy, Primary Care, and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Susan MalveauCenter for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
McKenna SmithDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Mengtao DaiDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Avery B NathensSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nina E GlassDepartment of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Peter C JenkinsDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
K John McConnellCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Katherine E RemickDepartments of Pediatrics and Surgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin.
Hilary HewesNational Emergency Medical Services for Children Data Analysis Resource Center, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
N Clay MannDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Pediatric Readiness Study Group
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Utah · USPrimary Children's Hospital · USIndiana University School of MedicineRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USStanford University · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThe University of Texas at Austin · USUCLA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

The Value of Pediatric Readiness in the Emergency Care of Injured ChildrenR24HD085927 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NEWGARD, CRAIG D. · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD085927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The National Pediatric Readiness Project is a US initiative to improve emergency department (ED) readiness to care for acutely ill and injured children. However, it is unclear whether high ED pediatric readiness is associated with improved survival in US trauma centers. Objective: To evaluate the association between ED pediatric readiness, in-hospital mortality, and in-hospital complications among injured children presenting to US trauma centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of 832 EDs in US trauma centers in 50 states and the District of Columbia was conducted using data from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017. Injured children younger than 18 years who were admitted, transferred, or with injury-related death in a participating trauma center were included in the analysis. Subgroups included children with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or above, indicating overall seriously injured (accounting for all injuries); any Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of 3 or above, indicating at least 1 serious injury; a head AIS score of 3 or above, indicating serious brain injury; and need for early use of critical resources. Exposures: Emergency department pediatric readiness for the initial ED visit, measured through the weighted Pediatric Readiness Score (range, 0-100) from the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Project ED pediatric readiness assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures: In-hospital mortality, with a secondary composite outcome of in-hospital mortality or complication. For the primary measurement tools used, the possible range of the AIS is 0 to 6, with 3 or higher indicating a serious injury; the possible range of the ISS is 0 to 75, with 16 or higher indicating serious overall injury. The weighted Pediatric Readiness Score examines and scores 6 domains; in this study, the lowest quartile included scores of 29 to 62 and the highest quartile included scores of 93 to 100. Results: There were 372 004 injured children (239 273 [64.3%] boys; median age, 10 years [interquartile range, 4-15 years]), including 5700 (1.5%) who died in-hospital and 5018 (1.3%) who developed in-hospital complications. Subgroups included 50 440 children (13.6%) with an ISS of 16 or higher, 124 507 (33.5%) with any AIS score of 3 or higher, 57 368 (15.4%) with a head AIS score of 3 or higher, and 32 671 (8.8%) requiring early use of critical resources. Compared with EDs in the lowest weighted Pediatric Readiness Score quartile, children cared for in the highest ED quartile had lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.75), but not fewer complications (aOR for the composite outcome 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74-1.04). These findings were consistent across subgroups, strata, and multiple sensitivity analyses. If all children cared for in the lowest-readiness quartiles (1-3) were treated in an ED in the highest quartile of readiness, an additional 126 lives (95% CI, 97-154 lives) might be saved each year in these trauma centers. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, injured children treated in high-readiness EDs had lower mortality compared with similar children in low-readiness EDs, but not fewer complications. These findings support national efforts to increase ED pediatric readiness in US trauma centers that care for children.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCivil DefenseCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePediatricsRetrospective StudiesTrauma CentersUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34096991
PMCPMC8185631
OpenAlexW3171874630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.