ArticleJAMA pediatrics2021
Evaluation of Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Outcomes Among US Trauma Centers.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive meta-analysis of emergency trauma outcomes: trends, interventions, and survival rates.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Pediatric vs Adult or Mixed Trauma Centers in Children Admitted to Hospitals Following Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2021.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2022Guideline
- Consensus-driven model to establish paediatric emergency care measures for low-volume emergency departments.BMJ open quality · 2022Guideline
- Impact of Tele-Emergency Consultations on Pediatric Interfacility Transfers: A Cluster-Randomized Crossover Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- A Qualitative Needs Assessment for Pediatric Care Partnerships in Community Emergency Departments.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- "The resources are so far, and you need them right here": Perspectives on Emergency Care for Youth who Experience Violence.Academic pediatrics · 2026Article
- Designing and Implementing a Simulation-Based Pediatric Trauma Training Program in a Resource-Limited Setting: The PRACTICE Study.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Child Opportunity Index Levels and Disparities in Access to Pediatric-ready Emergency Departments.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Measuring Pediatric Disaster Readiness of United States Emergency Departments.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- The effects of time and distance to definitive care on morbidity and mortality in pediatric injury patients in Northern Tanzania.Journal of tropical pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Mortality Outcomes Following Pediatric Emergency Department Visits: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2026Review
- Changes in Access to High Pediatric Readiness Emergency Care in the United States from 2013 to 2021.The Journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Western pediatric cervical spine study: an observational prospective Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium and Western Trauma Association multicenter study protocol.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- Pediatric emergency care: Determinants and systematic barriers.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Review
- Systems-based care of the injured child: Technical report.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2025Article
- Age and trauma center-specific disparities in splenectomy rates for pediatric trauma patients.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
- EMS Agency Characteristics and Adverse Events in Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Among 49 U.S. EMS Agencies.Prehospital emergency care · 2025Article
- [Analysis of the main update content of the 7th edition of the American College of Surgeons on "Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient (2022 Standards)"].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024Article
- State and National Estimates of the Cost of Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Lives Saved.JAMA network open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The National Pediatric Readiness Project is a US initiative to improve emergency department (ED) readiness to care for acutely ill and injured children. However, it is unclear whether high ED pediatric readiness is associated with improved survival in US trauma centers. Objective: To evaluate the association between ED pediatric readiness, in-hospital mortality, and in-hospital complications among injured children presenting to US trauma centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of 832 EDs in US trauma centers in 50 states and the District of Columbia was conducted using data from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017. Injured children younger than 18 years who were admitted, transferred, or with injury-related death in a participating trauma center were included in the analysis. Subgroups included children with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or above, indicating overall seriously injured (accounting for all injuries); any Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of 3 or above, indicating at least 1 serious injury; a head AIS score of 3 or above, indicating serious brain injury; and need for early use of critical resources. Exposures: Emergency department pediatric readiness for the initial ED visit, measured through the weighted Pediatric Readiness Score (range, 0-100) from the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Project ED pediatric readiness assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures: In-hospital mortality, with a secondary composite outcome of in-hospital mortality or complication. For the primary measurement tools used, the possible range of the AIS is 0 to 6, with 3 or higher indicating a serious injury; the possible range of the ISS is 0 to 75, with 16 or higher indicating serious overall injury. The weighted Pediatric Readiness Score examines and scores 6 domains; in this study, the lowest quartile included scores of 29 to 62 and the highest quartile included scores of 93 to 100. Results: There were 372 004 injured children (239 273 [64.3%] boys; median age, 10 years [interquartile range, 4-15 years]), including 5700 (1.5%) who died in-hospital and 5018 (1.3%) who developed in-hospital complications. Subgroups included 50 440 children (13.6%) with an ISS of 16 or higher, 124 507 (33.5%) with any AIS score of 3 or higher, 57 368 (15.4%) with a head AIS score of 3 or higher, and 32 671 (8.8%) requiring early use of critical resources. Compared with EDs in the lowest weighted Pediatric Readiness Score quartile, children cared for in the highest ED quartile had lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.75), but not fewer complications (aOR for the composite outcome 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74-1.04). These findings were consistent across subgroups, strata, and multiple sensitivity analyses. If all children cared for in the lowest-readiness quartiles (1-3) were treated in an ED in the highest quartile of readiness, an additional 126 lives (95% CI, 97-154 lives) might be saved each year in these trauma centers. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, injured children treated in high-readiness EDs had lower mortality compared with similar children in low-readiness EDs, but not fewer complications. These findings support national efforts to increase ED pediatric readiness in US trauma centers that care for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.