Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096979›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2021

Risk of Subsequent Fractures in Postmenopausal Women After Nontraumatic vs Traumatic Fractures.

Carolyn J Crandall, Joseph C Larson, Andrea Z LaCroix, John A Robbins, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Karen C Johnson, Maryam Sattari, Katie L Stone, Julie C Weitlauf, Tanya R Gure and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A meta-analysis of smoking and fracture risk to update the FRAX® tool.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Body mass index and subsequent fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update the FRAX® risk assessment tool.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Long-term trends in the burden of fracture of vertebral column in China: a comprehensive analysis from 1990 to 2021 based on the global burden of disease study 2021.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carolyn J CrandallDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.
Joseph C LarsonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Andrea Z LaCroixDepartment of Epidemiology, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
John A RobbinsCenter for Healthcare Policy and Research, Department of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California.
Jean Wactawski-WendeDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo.
Karen C JohnsonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
Maryam SattariGeneral Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.
Katie L StoneCalifornia Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco.
Julie C WeitlaufVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Tanya R GureThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbus.
Jane A CauleyDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

COcoa Supplement and Multivitamins Outcomes Study (COSMOS): Effects on Falls and Physical PerformanceR01AG071611 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CRANDALL, CAROLYN JANET, LEBOFF, MERYL SUSAN · 2021 to 2024
$2.7M
Sleep, Falls and Fractures in men and women: Role of nocturnal hypoxiaR01AG071592 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JANE Ann CAULEY · 2021 to 2026
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071592NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The burden of fractures among postmenopausal women is high. Although nontraumatic fractures are strong risk factors for future fracture, current clinical guidelines do not address traumatic fractures. Objective: To determine how future fracture risk varies according to whether an initial fracture is traumatic or nontraumatic. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a prospective observational study using data from the Women's Health Initiative Study (WHI) (enrollment, September 1994-December 1998; data analysis, September 2020 to March 2021), which enrolled postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years at baseline at 40 US clinical centers. The WHI Clinical Trials and WHI Bone Density Substudy, conducted at 3 of the clinical centers, asked participants to report the mechanism of incident fractures. Of 75 335 participants, information regarding incident fracture and covariates was available for 66 874 participants (88.8%), who comprised the analytic sample of this study. Mean (SD) follow-up was 8.1 (1.6) years. Interventions: None. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident clinical fractures were self-reported at least annually and confirmed using medical records. Participants reported the mechanism of incident fracture as traumatic or nontraumatic. Results: Among the 66 874 participants in the analytic sample (mean [SD] age, 63.1 [7.0] years and 65.3 [7.2] years among women without and with clinical fracture, respectively), 7142 participants (10.7%) experienced incident fracture during the study follow-up period. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of subsequent fracture after initial fracture was 1.49 (95% CI, 1.38-1.61). Among women whose initial fracture was traumatic, the association between initial fracture and subsequent fracture was significantly increased (aHR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.48). Among women whose initial fracture was nontraumatic, the association between initial fracture and subsequent fracture was also increased (aHR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.37-1.68). Confidence intervals for associations between initial fracture and subsequent fracture were overlapping for traumatic and nontraumatic initial fracture strata. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, among postmenopausal women older than 50 years, fracture was associated with a greater risk of subsequent fracture regardless of whether the fracture was traumatic or nontraumatic. These findings suggest that clinical osteoporosis assessment should include high-trauma as well as low-trauma fractures.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesWounds and InjuriesAgedBone DensityCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostmenopauseProportional Hazards ModelsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited StatesWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID34096979
PMCPMC8185628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.