Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096879›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2021

Benefits of Digital Health Resources for Substance Use Concerns in Women: Scoping Review.

Lena Quilty, Branka Agic, Michelle Coombs, Betty-Lou Kristy, Jill Shakespeare, Adrienne Spafford, Reena Besa, Shadini Dematagoda, Alina Patel, Rebecca Persaud and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lena QuiltyCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-4363
Branka AgicCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-1296
Michelle CoombsThe Jean Tweed Treatment Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-2249
Betty-Lou KristyCentre for Innovation in Peer Support, Support House, Oakville, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1954-4211
Jill ShakespeareCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-8689
Adrienne SpaffordAddictions and Mental Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8254-8680
Reena BesaCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1455-5483
Shadini DematagodaCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-5010
Alina PatelCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6267-9886
Rebecca PersaudCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7907-690X
Leslie BuckleyCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3134-7504
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CACentre for Social Innovation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health resources are being increasingly used to support women with substance use concerns. Although empirical research has demonstrated that these resources have promise, the available evidence for their benefit in women requires further investigation. Evidence supports the capacity of interventions that are sex-, gender-, and trauma-informed to improve treatment access and outcomes and to reduce health system challenges and disparities. Indeed, both sex- and gender-specific approaches are critical to improve health and gender equity. Violence and trauma are frequent among those with substance use concerns, but they disproportionately affect those who identify as female or women, further underscoring the need for trauma-informed care as well.

objectiveThe objective of this investigation was to evaluate the evidence supporting the efficacy or effectiveness of online or mobile interventions for risky or harmful substance use in adults who identify as female or women, or who report a history of trauma.

methodsThis scoping review is based on an academic search in MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL, as well as a grey literature search in US and Canadian government and funding agency websites. Of the 7807 records identified, 465 remained following title and abstract screening. Of these, 159 met all eligibility criteria and were reviewed and synthesized.

resultsThe 159 records reflected 141 distinct studies and 125 distinct interventions. Investigations and the interventions evaluated predominantly focused on alcohol use or general substance use. Evaluated digital health resources included multisession and brief-session interventions, with a wide range of therapeutic elements. Multisession online and mobile interventions exhibited beneficial effects in 86.1% (105/122) of studies. Single-session interventions similarly demonstrated beneficial effects in 64.2% (43/67) of study conditions. Most investigations did not assess gender identity or conduct sex- or gender-based analyses. Only 13 investigations that included trauma were identified.

conclusionsDespite the overall promise of digital health interventions for substance use concerns, direct or quantitative evidence on the efficacy or effectiveness of interventions in females or women specifically is weak.

Indexed as

digital healthfemalegender-specificinternetmobile appsubstance use concernstechnologytechnology-based interventiontechnology interventionstraumaweb-based interventionwomen

Identifiers

PMID34096879
PMCPMC8218208
OpenAlexW3159596252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.