Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096840›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2021

Insight into phenotypic and genotypic differences between vaginal

Paolo Emidio Costantini, Andrea Firrincieli, Stefano Fedi, Carola Parolin, Carlo Viti, Martina Cappelletti, Beatrice Vitali

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The activity of cell-free supernatant ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Amygdalin Reverses Macrophage PANoptosis Induced by Drug-ResistantJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Extracellular Vesicles Generated by Gram-Positive Bacteria Protect Human TissuesFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paolo Emidio CostantiniDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBit), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea FirrincieliDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBit), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano FediDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBit), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Carola ParolinDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBit), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo VitiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Martina CappellettiDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBit), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Beatrice VitaliDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBit), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vaginal microbiota, normally characterized by lactobacilli presence, is crucial for vaginal health. Members belonging to

Indexed as

GenotypePhenotypeDietFemaleGenome, BacterialGenomicsHumansLactobacillusLactobacillus crispatusLactobacillus gasseriMicrobiotaStress, PsychologicalVaginacomparative genomicsLactobacillus crispatusLactobacillus gasseriLactobacillus genomicsphenotype microarrayvaginal niche

Identifiers

PMID34096840
PMCPMC8461478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.