Observational studyScandinavian journal of primary health care2021
Weak association between socioeconomic Care Need Index and primary care visits per registered patient in three Swedish regions.
Observational study in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can the Care Need Index Identify Healthcare Centres With Higher Proportions of Children at Risk?Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Article
- Identifying children at risk in Swedish Child Health Services.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2025Article
- Risk Adjustment in Capitation Payments to Primary Care Providers: Does It Matter How We Account for Patients' Socioeconomic Status?Medical care · 2025Article
- Better with GPs as managers? - Variation in perceptions of feedback messages, goal-clarity and performance across manager´s in Swedish primary care.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Fifteen years with patient choice and free establishment in Swedish primary healthcare: what do we know?Scandinavian journal of public health · 2022Review
- New reimbursement model in Icelandic primary care in 2017: first-year comparison of public and private primary care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective was to examine the association between primary care consultations and a Care Need Index (CNI) used to compensate Swedish primary care practices for the extra workload associated with patients with low socioeconomic status.
designObservational study combining graphical analysis with linear regressions of cross-sectional administrative practice-level data.
settingThree Swedish regions, Västra Götaland, Skåne and Östergötland (3.5 million residents). Outcomes were measured in February 2018 and the CNI was computed based on data for 31 December 2017. SUBJECTS: The unit of analysis was the primary care practice (
main outcome measuresi) Number of GP visits per registered patient; ii) Number of nurse visits per registered patient; iii) Number of morbidity-weighted GP visits per registered patient; iv) Number of morbidity-weighted nurse visits per registered patient.
resultsThe linear associations between the CNI and GP visits per patient were positive and statistically significant (p<0.01) for both the unweighted and weighted measure in two regions, but the associations were mainly due to 10 practices with very high CNI values. The results for nurse visits varied across regions.
conclusionsFor most levels of the CNI, there was no association with the number of consultations provided. This result may indicate insufficient compensation, weak incentives to spend the money, decisions to spend the money on other things than consultations, or stronger competition for patients among low-CNI practices. The result of this observational study should not be taken as evidence against the possibility that the CNI adjustment of capitation may have affected the socioeconomic equity in GP and nurse visits.Key PointsSwedish primary care practices receive extra compensation for socioeconomically deprived patients but it is unknown how this affects service provision.Practice-level data from three regions years 2017-2018 indicate weak or no relation between the socioeconomic burden and the number of physical consultations per patient.Results are similar when adjusting for patients' morbidity levels, suggesting that the weak gradient was not explained by longer consultations.The exception is that a small number of practices with very high burdens provide more consultations per patient.The results may reflect insufficient compensation, lack of incentives, or funds being spent on other things than consultations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.