Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096671›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

Association between punitive policies and neonatal abstinence syndrome among Medicaid-insured infants in complex policy environments.

Laura J Faherty, Sara Heins, Ashley M Kranz, Stephen W Patrick, Bradley D Stein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Health Inequities Among People Who Use Drugs in a Post-The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura J FahertyRAND Corporation, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8953-8856
Sara HeinsRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0196-9000
Ashley M KranzRAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA.
Stephen W PatrickRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6958-0371
Bradley D SteinRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
RAND Corporation · USBoston University · US

Funding

Optimal Methods for Estimating Policy Effect Heterogeneity in Opioid Policy ResearchP50DA046351 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI Rosanna Smart · 2018 to 2026
$20.8M
Improving Access to Treatment for Women with Opioid Use DisorderR01DA045729 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PATRICK, STEPHEN W · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
An Exploratory Analysis of the Association of State Policies with Neonatal Abstinence SyndromeR21DA045212 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI FAHERTY, LAURA JOHNSON · 2018 to 2019
$490k
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA046351NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045729NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA045212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo estimate the association between punitive policies for women with substance use during pregnancy and odds of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) diagnosis among Medicaid-insured infants, and to estimate this association controlling for the presence of four other policies related to substance use in pregnancy. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsAnalysis of live births in Medicaid claims data from 39 US states in varying years between 2006 and 2014 using weighted generalized linear models with clustered standard errors and state and year fixed-effects. MEASUREMENTS: NAS rates in states without punitive policies were compared with rates in states with policies before and after policy enactment using logistic regression models adjusted for individual and county-level factors and including state and year fixed-effects. We estimated odds of NAS controlling for the presence of a potentially treatment-deterring policy requiring reporting of suspected prenatal substance use, and three treatment-supportive policies that create targeted programs for pregnant and postpartum women, prioritize pregnant women's access to substance use disorder treatment programs and prohibit discrimination towards pregnant women in treatment programs.

findingsAmong 9 714 798 weighted live births (1 896 082 unweighted), 49 670 (0.51%) had an NAS diagnosis. The findings were inconclusive as to whether or not punitive policies were associated with odds of NAS either in the short or long term. Odds of NAS among infants born in states with reporting policies were lower than those born in states without such policies [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.98].

conclusionsIn the United States, punitive policies for women with substance use during pregnancy do not appear to be associated with lower odds of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Reporting policies, which are heterogenous in their components and implementation, appear to be associated with lower odds of NAS when controlling for other relevant policies.

Indexed as

Neonatal Abstinence SyndromeOpioid-Related DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsSubstance-Related DisordersFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMedicaidPolicyPregnancyUnited StatesMedicaidneonatal abstinence syndromeneonatal opioid withdrawal syndromeopioid use disorderpregnancysubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID34096671
PMCPMC8648865
OpenAlexW3170341857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.