Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096607›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell science2021

Trim9 and Klp61F promote polymerization of new dendritic microtubules along parallel microtubules.

Chengye Feng, Joseph M Cleary, Gregory O Kothe, Michelle C Stone, Alexis T Weiner, James I Hertzler, William O Hancock, Melissa M Rolls

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chengye FengBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department and the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Joseph M ClearyBiomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Gregory O KotheBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department and the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Michelle C StoneBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department and the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Alexis T WeinerBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department and the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0186-0921
James I HertzlerBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department and the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8025-8367
William O HancockBiomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5547-8755
Melissa M RollsBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Department and the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5021-4360
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Using Drosophila Neurons to Identify Mechanisms that Control Microtubule PolarityR01GM085115 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Melissa Rolls · 2010 to 2026
$5.1M
Molecular mechanism of kinesin motilityR01GM076476 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HANCOCK, WILLIAM OLAF · 2006 to 2019
$3.5M
Research Training in Physiological Adaptations to StressT32GM108563 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI CANTORNA, MARGHERITA T, KORZICK, DONNA HOPE · 2014 to 2023
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076476NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085115NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM108563NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axons and dendrites are distinguished by microtubule polarity. In Drosophila, dendrites are dominated by minus-end-out microtubules, whereas axons contain plus-end-out microtubules. Local nucleation in dendrites generates microtubules in both orientations. To understand why dendritic nucleation does not disrupt polarity, we used live imaging to analyze the fate of microtubules generated at branch points. We found that they had different rates of success exiting the branch based on orientation: correctly oriented minus-end-out microtubules succeeded in leaving about twice as often as incorrectly oriented microtubules. Increased success relied on other microtubules in a parallel orientation. From a candidate screen, we identified Trim9 and kinesin-5 (Klp61F) as machinery that promoted growth of new microtubules. In S2 cells, Eb1 recruited Trim9 to microtubules. Klp61F promoted microtubule growth in vitro and in vivo, and could recruit Trim9 in S2 cells. In summary, the data argue that Trim9 and kinesin-5 act together at microtubule plus ends to help polymerizing microtubules parallel to pre-existing ones resist catastrophe.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityDendritesKinesinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesPolymerizationKinesinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsKinesinMicrotubulePolarity

Identifiers

PMID34096607
PMCPMC8214762
OpenAlexW3160890601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.