Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096599›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2021

Mouse vocal emission and acoustic complexity do not scale linearly with the size of a social group.

Megan R Warren, Morgan S Spurrier, Daniel T Sangiamo, Rachel S Clein, Joshua P Neunuebel

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Vocal registers expand signal diversity in vertebrate vocal communication.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Maturation of Social-Vocal Communication in Prairie Vole (Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan R WarrenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Morgan S SpurrierDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Daniel T SangiamoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Rachel S CleinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Joshua P NeunuebelDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4894-4364
University of Delaware · USEmory University · US

Funding

Updated confocal microscope in the Imaging Core facility to support biomedical researchP20GM103653 · NIGMS · DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HARRINGTON, MELISSA A · 2012 to 2022
$22.7M
Neural Encoding of Social InformationR01MH122752 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI NEUNUEBEL, JOSHUA P · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103653NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult mice emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), sounds above the range of human hearing, during social encounters. While mice alter their vocal emissions between isolated and social contexts, technological impediments have hampered our ability to assess how individual mice vocalize in group social settings. We overcame this challenge by implementing an 8-channel microphone array system, allowing us to determine which mouse emitted individual vocalizations across multiple social contexts. This technology, in conjunction with a new approach for extracting and categorizing a complex, full repertoire of vocalizations, facilitated our ability to directly compare how mice modulate their vocal emissions between isolated, dyadic and group social environments. When comparing vocal emission during isolated and social settings, we found that socializing male mice increase the proportion of vocalizations with turning points in frequency modulation and instantaneous jumps in frequency. Moreover, males change the types of vocalizations emitted between social and isolated contexts. In contrast, there was no difference in male vocal emission between dyadic and group social contexts. Female vocal emission, while predominantly absent in isolation, was also similar during dyadic and group interactions. In particular, there were no differences in the proportion of vocalizations with frequency jumps or turning points. Taken together, the findings lay the groundwork necessary for elucidating the stimuli underlying specific features of vocal emission in mice.

Indexed as

AcousticsVocalization, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceSocial BehaviorSoundUltrasonicsAnimal communicationMouse ultrasonic vocalizationsSocial behaviorSound source localization

Identifiers

PMID34096599
PMCPMC8214829
OpenAlexW3158536652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.