Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096424›Full record

ReviewWomen's health (London, England)

Human papillomavirus persistence or clearance after infection in reproductive age. What is the status? Review of the literature and new data of a vaginal gel containing silicate dioxide, citric acid, and selenite.

Johannes Huber, Anna Mueller, Manuela Sailer, Pedro-Antonio Regidor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness ofThe Journal of international medical research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes HuberUniversitätsfrauenklinik Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Anna MuellerExeltis Germany GmbH, Ismaning, Germany.
Manuela SailerExeltis Germany GmbH, Ismaning, Germany.
Pedro-Antonio RegidorExeltis Germany, Ismaning, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9551-2847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer, the third most common cancer in women, is caused in nearly all cases by a persistent infection with high-risk types of the human papillomavirus. Although human papillomavirus infections are 80%-90% transient and disappear spontaneously within 24 months, human papillomavirus infections that remain are at risk of developing cervical lesions. Different therapeutical approaches have been tested to promote the regression of low-grade lesions or prevent progression. They include the application of 5-fluorouracil, curcumin, imiquimod, interferons, Vitamin D, and others. Also, the effect of probiotics and vaginal therapy with carboxy-methyl-beta glucan was assessed. Review of the literature and presentation of the last study data are presented. Clearance of high-risk human papillomavirus seemed to be promoted by treatment with a new vaginal gel containing a highly disperse SiO

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCitric AcidFemaleHumansPapillomaviridaeSelenious AcidSilicatesSilicon DioxideVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesVaginal SmearsCitric AcidSelenious AcidSilicatesSilicon DioxideVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellieshuman papillomavirus clearancePap testingsilicon dioxidevaginal gel

Identifiers

PMID34096424
PMCPMC8785287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.