Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096390›Full record

ReviewJournal of primary care & community health

Cardio-Pulmonary Sequelae in Recovered COVID-19 Patients: Considerations for Primary Care.

Zouina Sarfraz, Azza Sarfraz, Alanna Barrios, Radhika Garimella, Asimina Dominari, Manish Kc, Krunal Pandav, Juan C Pantoja, Varadha Retnakumar, Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Cardiovascular complications in the Post-Acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS).International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Zouina SarfrazLarkin Health System, South Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5132-7455
Azza SarfrazLarkin Health System, South Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8206-5745
Alanna BarriosLarkin Health System, South Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8332-8682
Radhika GarimellaLarkin Health System, South Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0726-6923
Asimina DominariLarkin Health System, South Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-9767
Manish KcLarkin Health System, South Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1693-6068
Krunal PandavLarkin Health System, South Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5451-7115
Juan C PantojaLarkin Health System, South Miami, FL, USA.
Varadha RetnakumarLarkin Health System, South Miami, FL, USA.
Ivan Cherrez-OjedaUniversidad Espiritu Santo, Samborondon, Ecuador.
Larkin University · USAga Khan University · PKFatima Jinnah Medical University · PKUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent literature lacks characterization of the post-recovery sequelae among COVID-19 patients. This review characterizes the course of clinical, laboratory, radiological findings during the primary infection period, and the complications post-recovery. Primary care findings are presented for long-COVID care.

methodsAdhering to PRISMA guidelines, 4 databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Scopus) through December 5, 2020, using the keywords "COVID-19 and/or recovered and/or cardiovascular and/or long-term and/or sequelae and/or sub-acute and/or complication." We included published peer-reviewed case reports, case series, and cross-sectional studies providing the clinical course of COVID-19 infection, and cardiopulmonary complications of patients who recovered from COVID-19, while making healthcare considerations for primary care workers.

resultsWe identified 29 studies across 9 countries including 37.9% Chinese and 24.1% U.S. studies, comprising 655 patients (Mean Age = 45) with various ethnical backgrounds including Asian and European. Based on the WHO COVID-19 severity classification scale, initial disease severity was mild for 377 patients and severe for 52 patients. Treatments during primary infection included corticosteroids, oxygen support, and antivirals. The mean value (in days) for complication onset after acute recovery was 28 days. Complete blood counts and RT-PCR tests were the most common laboratory results described. In 22 of the studies, patients showed signs of clinical improvement and were prescribed medications such as anticoagulants or corticosteroids.

conclusionPost-recovery infectious complications are common in long-COVID-19 patients ranging from mild infections to life-threatening conditions. International thoracic and cardiovascular societies need to develop guidelines for patients recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia, while focused patient care by the primary care physician is crucial to curb preventable adverse events. Recommendations for real-time and lab-quality diagnostic tests are warranted to establish point-of-care testing, detect early complications, and provide timely treatment.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2cardiacCOVID-19long COVIDprimary carepulmonary

Identifiers

PMID34096390
PMCPMC8188976
OpenAlexW3168981433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.