Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096202›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2021

Sensory white noise improves reading skills and memory recall in children with reading disability.

Göran B W Söderlund, Jakob Åsberg Johnels, Bodil Rothén, Ellen Torstensson-Hultberg, Andreas Magnusson, Linda Fälth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sensory white noise in clinical ADHD: Who benefits from noise, and who performs worse?Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2024
    Article
  7. The Effects of White Noise on Attentional Performance and On-Task Behaviors in Preschoolers with ADHD.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Göran B W SöderlundFaculty of Teacher Education Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5941-8431
Jakob Åsberg JohnelsSpeech and Language Pathology Unit & the Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Silvia Children's Hospital, University of Gothenburg & The Child Neuropsychiatric Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bodil RothénDepartment of Pedagogy and Learning, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Ellen Torstensson-HultbergDepartment of Pedagogy and Learning, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Andreas MagnussonComplex Adaptive Systems, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Linda FälthDepartment of Pedagogy and Learning, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Linnaeus University · SEChalmers University of Technology · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReading disability (RD) is characterized by slow and inaccurate word reading development, commonly reflecting underlying phonological problems. We have previously shown that exposure to white noise acutely improves cognitive performance in children with ADHD. The question addressed here is whether white noise exposure yields positive outcomes also for RD. There are theoretical reasons to expect such a possibility: a) RD and ADHD are two overlapping neurodevelopmental disorders and b) since prior research on white noise benefits has suggested that a central mechanism might be the phenomenon of stochastic resonance, then adding certain kinds of white noise might strengthen the signal-to-noise ratio during phonological processing and phoneme-grapheme mapping.

methodsThe study was conducted with a group of 30 children with RD and phonological decoding difficulties and two comparison groups: one consisting of skilled readers (n = 22) and another of children with mild orthographic reading problems and age adequate phonological decoding (n = 30). White noise was presented experimentally in visual and auditory modalities, while the children performed tests of single word reading, orthographic word recognition, nonword reading, and memory recall.

resultsFor the first time, we show that visual and auditory white noise exposure improves some reading and memory capacities "on the fly" in children with RD and phonological decoding difficulties. By contrast, the comparison groups displayed either no benefit or a gradual decrease in performance with increasing noise. In interviews, we also found that the white noise exposure was tolerable or even preferred by many children.

conclusionThese novel findings suggest that poor readers with phonological decoding difficulties may be immediately helped by white noise during reading. Future research is needed to determine the robustness, mechanisms, and long-term practical implications of the white noise benefits in children with reading disabilities.

Indexed as

DyslexiaPersons with DisabilitiesBlindnessChildHumansMemoryPhoneticsTimeauditory white noisedyslexianoise benefitreading disabilitystochastic resonancevisual white pixel noise

Identifiers

PMID34096202
PMCPMC8323032
OpenAlexW3167020298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.