Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34096065›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2021

Group-level physiological synchrony and individual-level anxiety predict positive affective behaviors during a group decision-making task.

Ilanit Gordon, Sebastian Wallot, Yair Berson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Route of fire: Pregame rituals and emotional synchrony among Brazilian football fans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Interpersonal heart rate synchrony predicts effective information processing in a naturalistic group decision-making task.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ilanit GordonDepartment of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4888-1308
Sebastian WallotInstitute of Psychology, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Yair BersonDepartment of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Bar-Ilan University · ILLeuphana University of Lüneburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Joint performance can lead to the synchronization of physiological processes among group members during a shared task. Recently, it has been shown that synchronization is indicative of subjective ratings of group processes and task performance. However, different methods have been used to quantify synchronization, and little is known about the effects of the choice of method and level of analysis (individuals, dyads, or triads) on the results. In this study, participants performed a decision-making task in groups of three while physiological signals (heart rate and electrodermal activity), positive affective behavior, and personality traits were measured. First, we investigated the effects of different levels of analysis of physiological synchrony on affective behavior. We computed synchrony measures as (a) individual contributions to group synchrony, (b) the average dyadic synchrony within a group, and (c) group-level synchrony. Second, we assessed the association between physiological synchrony and positive affective behavior. Third, we investigated the moderating effects of trait anxiety and social phobia on behavior. We discovered that the effects of physiological synchrony on positive affective behavior were particularly strong at the group level but nonsignificant at the individual and dyadic levels. Moreover, we found that heart rate and electrodermal synchronization showed opposite effects on group members' display of affective behavior. Finally, trait anxiety moderated the relationship between physiological synchrony and affective behavior, perhaps due to social uncertainty, while social phobia did not have a moderating effect. We discuss these results regarding the role of different physiological signals and task demands during joint action.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesAdultAffectAnxietyDecision MakingFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHeart RateHumansMalePersonalityPhobia, SocialYoung Adultelectrodermal activitygroup interactionsheart rateinterpersonal synchronymultidimensional recurrence quantification analysisphysiological synchrony

Identifiers

PMID34096065
PMCPMC9286561
OpenAlexW3168256231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.