Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34095972›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Hyphal growth of Penicillium rubens in changing relative humidity.

Philip Ruijten, Hendrik P Huinink, Olaf C G Adan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Morphology ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philip RuijtenDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612, AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-7721
Hendrik P HuininkDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612, AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. H.P.Huinink@tue.nl.
Olaf C G AdanDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612, AZ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-9720

Funding

Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen 11117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When considering mold prevention strategies, the environmental conditions in which fungi grow need to be taken into consideration. This environment is often characterized by a time-dependent relative humidity, and porous substrate. Growth has mainly been investigated in steady-state experiments. Therefore, the goal of this study is to understand the hyphal growth of Penicillium rubens on porous gypsum, under dynamic humidity conditions. Spores of P. rubens were inoculated on porous gypsum containing nutrients, and placed in a small incubation chamber, allowing for microscopic hyphal observation. The relative humidity in this chamber varied multiple times between a high (close to 100%) and low value (35%, 55%, or 75%). The hyphae reacted to a lowered relative humidity by an immediate growth stop and dehydration. When the relative humidity was increased again, the hyphae re-hydrated and three responses were found: regrowing after approximately 4 h, after a time equal to the germination time, or no regrowth at all. No substantial regrowth was found for fluctuations faster than 4 h. This time-scale was found for multiple decreases in relative humidity, and has been reported for the first time. KEY POINTS: • Hyphae restart growth after a characteristic time of approximately 4 h. • Relative humidity fluctuations of 3 h can suppress hyphal growth. • Hyphae do not regrow after a severe desiccation and short periods of high humidity.

Indexed as

PenicilliumCalcium SulfateHumidityHyphaeCalcium SulfateDynamic relative humidityHyphal growthMicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID34095972
PMCPMC8236038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.