Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34095969›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Changes in forest areas and land cover and their causes using intensity analysis: the case of Alabarda forest planning unit.

Sinan Kaptan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sinan KaptanDepartment of Forest Management and Planning, Faculty of Forestry, Bartın University, 74100, Bartın, Turkey. skaptan@bartin.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6059-5163

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The examination of land cover change, as the main driving force of global climate change, and the determination of its economic, ecological, and social effects are necessary for making the right decisions in sustainable development, planning, and management. This study, conducted in the local forest areas of Alabarda, located in Tavşanlı District (Turkey), examined temporal and spatial changes in land cover using an intensity analysis consisting of three levels: interval, category, and transition. Using the three maps of 1994, 2004, and 2015, we analyzed the land use changes during two time intervals (1993-2004 and 2004-2015) in the area for six categories, including three for forest areas (Productive, Degraded, and Treeless) and three for non-forest areas (Others, e.g., mine sites, roads, wetlands; Settlement; and Cultivated). The interval level results of the analysis showed that the land change rate was more rapid in the 2004-2015 time interval compared to 1993-2004. According to the category level results, in both time intervals, the Productive category was dormant in terms of loss and gain, whereas the Cultivated category was active. The level showing transitions between categories indicated that the Productive category targeted the Treeless and Cultivated losses in the first time interval and targeted the Degraded losses most intensely in the second time interval. The successful forestry activities (afforestation and rehabilitation) carried out by the government as of 2006 and the ongoing migration of the population from the region have had a joint effect on the increase of forest areas and the transformation of Degraded forest areas into Productive ones in the study area.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental MonitoringForestryForestsTurkeyForest cover changeGISIntensity analysisLand transformationSystematic transitionTurkey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.