Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34095741›Full record

ArticlePlant direct2021

Grapevine rootstocks affect growth-related scion phenotypes.

Zoë Migicovsky, Peter Cousins, Lindsay M Jordan, Sean Myles, Richard Keith Striegler, Paul Verdegaal, Daniel H Chitwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant direct, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zoë MigicovskyDepartment of Plant, Food and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Agriculture Dalhousie University Truro NS Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-1258
Peter CousinsE. & J. Gallo Winery Modesto CA USA.
Lindsay M JordanE. & J. Gallo Winery Acampo CA USA.
Sean MylesDepartment of Plant, Food and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Agriculture Dalhousie University Truro NS Canada.
Richard Keith StrieglerE. & J. Gallo Winery Acampo CA USA.
Paul VerdegaalUniversity of California Cooperative Extension San Joaquin Valley Stockton CA USA.
Daniel H ChitwoodDepartment of Horticulture Michigan State University East Lansing MI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4875-1447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grape growers use rootstocks to provide protection against pests and pathogens and to modulate viticulture performance such as shoot growth. Our study examined two grapevine scion varieties ('Chardonnay' and 'Cabernet Sauvignon') grafted to 15 different rootstocks and determined the effect of rootstocks on eight traits important to viticulture. We assessed the vines across five years and identified both year and variety as contributing strongly to trait variation. The effect of rootstock was relatively consistent across years and varieties, explaining between 8.99% and 9.78% of the variation in growth-related traits including yield, pruning weight, berry weight and Ravaz index (yield to pruning weight ratio). Increases in yield due to rootstock were generally the result of increases in berry weight, likely due to increased water uptake by vines grafted to a particular rootstock. We demonstrated a greater than 50% increase in yield, pruning weight, or Ravaz index by choosing the optimal rootstock, indicating that rootstock choice is crucial for grape growers looking to improve vine performance.

Indexed as

graftinggrapevinesroot‐shoot interactionsrootstocks

Identifiers

PMID34095741
PMCPMC8156960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.