Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34095720›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2021

Profiles of institutional departments affect operative outcomes of eight gastroenterological procedures.

Hiroyuki Konno, Kinji Kamiya, Arata Takahashi, Hiraku Kumamaru, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Shigeru Marubashi, Kenichi Hakamada, Hiroaki Miyata, Yasuyuki Seto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hiroyuki KonnoThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Database Committee Tokyo Japan.
Kinji KamiyaSecond Department of Surgery Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2501-9835
Arata TakahashiDepartment of Health Policy and Management School of Medicine Keio University Tokyo Japan.
Hiraku KumamaruDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Yoshihiro KakejiThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Database Committee Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-0241
Shigeru MarubashiThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Database Committee Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-3286
Kenichi HakamadaThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.
Hiroaki MiyataDepartment of Health Policy and Management School of Medicine Keio University Tokyo Japan.
Yasuyuki SetoThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6953-8752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe evaluated the association of profiles of institutional departments with operative outcomes of eight major gastroenterological procedures.

methodsWe administered a 15-item online survey to 2634 institutional departments in 2016 to investigate the association of questionnaire responses with operative mortality for the procedures. The proportions of conditions met were listed according to institutional volume and classified according to annual operative cases in 1464 departments. Group A included departments with annual performance of <40 cases of the eight procedures, B 40-79 cases, C 80-199 cases, D 200-499 cases, and E ≥ 500 cases. We evaluated the number of conditions met for 10 of 15 items that could be improved by efforts of institutional departments, to assess whether the profiles of institutional departments had impacts on operative mortality. We built a multivariable logistic regression model for operative mortality with facilities categorized based on the number of conditions met and procedure-specific predicted mortality as explanatory variables using generalized estimating equation to account for facility-level clustering. We also examined how operative outcomes differed between facilities meeting nine or more conditions and those that did not.

resultsWe recognized meeting nine out of the 10 conditions as being a good indicator for having appropriate structural and process measures for gastroenterological surgery. The facilities meeting nine or more of the conditions had better operative mortality for all eight procedures.

conclusionsOur findings reveal that the profiles of institutional departments can reflect the outcomes of gastroenterological surgery in Japan.

Indexed as

National clinical databaseobserved to expected (O/E) operative mortality ratiooperative mortalityprofiles of institutional departmentsquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID34095720
PMCPMC8164461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.