ArticleInternational journal of population data science2018
Challenges Associated with Cross-Jurisdictional Analyses using Administrative Health Data and Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Canada.
Article in International journal of population data science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effectiveness of alternatives to residential care for older people with on-going health and social care needs: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Synthetic health data in Canada: A scoping review of methods, applications, and data sources.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Attitudes towards data access and sharing health data for research: a case study of Australian data custodian perspectives.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026Article
- Health Data for Linguistic Minority Group Research in Canada: Proof-of-Concept Centralized Health Care Metadata Repository Development and Usability Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2026Article
- Child Health Research Using linked Multi-domain Canadian Administrative Data: A Scoping Review.International journal of population data science · 2026Article
- Use of administrative data for evaluating trends in medically-attended Lyme disease, Manitoba, Canada, 2010-2021.PloS one · 2026Article
- The COVID-19 Pandemic and Dementia: a Multijurisdictional Meta-Analysis of the Impact of the First Two Pandemic Waves on Acute Health-care Utilization and Mortality in Canada.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2025Article
- Characterising firearm-related databases across Canada: opportunities for data linkage to inform understanding of injury burden and prevention.International journal of population data science · 2025Article
- Challenges in diagnosis and health care in polycystic ovary syndrome in Canada: a patient view to improve health care.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- The Importance of and Challenges with Adopting Life-Cycle Regulation and Reimbursement in Canada.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2022Article
- Closing the loop: From system-based data to evidence-influenced policy and practice.International journal of population data science · 2021Article
- Factors affecting access to administrative health data for research in Canada: a study protocol.International journal of population data science · 2021Article
- The SPOR-Canadian Data Platform: a national initiative to facilitate data rich multi-jurisdictional research.International journal of population data science · 2020Article
- Development of comparable algorithms to measure primary care indicators using administrative health data across three Canadian provinces.International journal of population data science · 2020Article
- Exploring barriers and solutions in advancing cross-centre population data science.International journal of population data science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last 30 years, public investments in Canada and many other countries have created clinical and administrative health data repositories to support research on health and social services, population health and health policy. However, there is limited capacity to share and use data across jurisdictional boundaries, in part because of inefficient and cumbersome procedures to access these data and gain approval for their use in research. A lack of harmonization among variables and indicators makes it difficult to compare research among jurisdictions. These challenges affect the quality, scope, and impact of work that could be done. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the data access procedures in three Canadian jurisdictions (Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia), and to describe how we addressed the challenges presented by differences in data governance and architecture in a Canadian cross-jurisdictional research study. We characterize common stages in gaining access to administrative data among jurisdictions, including obtaining ethics approval, applying for data access from data custodians, and ensuring the extracted data is released to accredited individuals in secure data environments. We identify advantages of Manitoba's flexible 'stewardship' model over the more restrictive 'custodianship' model in British Columbia, and highlight the importance of communication between analysts in each jurisdiction to compensate for differences in coding variables and poor quality data. Researchers and system planners must have access to and be able to make effective use of administrative health data to ensure that Canadians continue to have access to high-quality health care and benefit from effective health policies. The considerable benefits of collaborative population-based research that spans jurisdictional borders have been recognized by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research in their recent call for the creation of a National Data Platform to resolve many of the issues in harmonization and validation of administrative data elements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.