ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2021
Successful
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ex vivo oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation in an adolescent patient with recurrent ovarian dysgerminoma: a case report and review of the literature.F&S reports · 2025Article
- Current state of fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult patients with gynecological cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Feasibility and Safety of Intraoperative Oocyte Retrieval in Patients With Ovarian Tumor: Results From the Japan Oncofertility Registry.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo report a case of direct
designcase report and literature review.
settingUniversity hospital. PATIENTS: A 29-year-old nulliparous patient, recently diagnosed with low grade serous ovarian carcinoma.The patient consented to the removal of her remaining ovary but wished to preserve oocytes and declined hysterectomy. Conventional trans-vaginal US-guided oocyte retrieval was contra-indicated because of the risk of malignant cell dissemination to the abdomen and the vaginal puncture sites.
interventionsControlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins was realized. Comprehensive surgical staging was performed 35 h after ovulation triggering using rHCG. The oocytes retrieval was performed
resultsSeven mature oocytes were obtained and vitrified.
conclusionsThis case highlights the feasibility of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.