Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34095388›Full record

ArticleData in brief2021

Arabica coffee leaf images dataset for coffee leaf disease detection and classification.

Jennifer Jepkoech, David Muchangi Mugo, Benson K Kenduiywo, Edna Chebet Too

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A review of deep learning architectures for plant disease detection.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Improved CNN Method for Crop Pest Identification Based on Transfer Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer JepkoechUniversity of Embu, P.O BOX 6 - 60100, Embu, Kenya.
David Muchangi MugoUniversity of Embu, P.O BOX 6 - 60100, Embu, Kenya.
Benson K KenduiywoJomo Kenyatta University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 62 000 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Edna Chebet TooChuka University, P.O BOX 109-60400, Chuka, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article introduces Arabica coffee leaf datasets known as JMuBEN and JMuBEN2. Image acquisition was done in Mutira coffee plantation in Kirinyaga county-Kenya under real-world conditions using a digital camera and with the help of a pathologist. JMuBEN dataset contains three compressed folders with images inside. The first file contains 7682 images of Cerscospora, the second contains 8337 images of rust and the last one contains 6572 images of Phoma. JMuBEN2 contains two compressed files where the first file contains 16,979 images of Miner while the other contains 18,985 images of healthy leaves. In total, the dataset contains 58,555 leaf images spread across five classes (Phoma, Cescospora, Rust, Healthy, Miner,) with annotations regarding the state of the leaves and the disease names. The Arabica datasets contain images that facilitates training and validation during the utilization of deep learning algorithms for coffee plant leaf disease recognition and classification. The dataset is publicly and freely available at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/tgv3zb82nd/1 and https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/t2r6rszp5c/1 respectively.

Indexed as

Arabica coffeeDeep learningDisease diagnosisImage datasetsMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34095388
PMCPMC8165403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.