Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34095290›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2021

Benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation in COVID-19: a prospective observational cohort study.

Rainer Gloeckl, Daniela Leitl, Inga Jarosch, Tessa Schneeberger, Christoph Nell, Nikola Stenzel, Claus F Vogelmeier, Klaus Kenn, Andreas R Koczulla

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05778344 (Efficacy of Teletechnology-assisted Home-based Exercise Program for Severe COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05778344 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Teletechnology-assisted Home-based Exercise Program for Severe COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsCOVID-19, TelerehabilitationArmsTeletechnology-assisted home-based pulmonary rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Non-Pharmacological Therapies for Post-Viral Syndromes, Including Long COVID: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rainer GloecklDept of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Daniela LeitlDept of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Inga JaroschDept of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Tessa SchneebergerDept of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Christoph NellDept of Pulmonology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Nikola StenzelPsychologische Hochschule Berlin (PHB), Berlin, Germany.
Claus F VogelmeierDept of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University of Marburg, Member of the DZL, Marburg, Germany.
Klaus KennDept of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Andreas R KoczullaDept of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Philipps-University of Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can result in a large variety of chronic health issues such as impaired lung function, reduced exercise performance and diminished quality of life. Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy, feasibility and safety of pulmonary rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients and to compare outcomes between patients with a mild/moderate and a severe/critical course of the disease.

methodsPatients in the post-acute phase of a mild to critical course of COVID-19 admitted to a comprehensive 3-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme were included in this prospective, observational cohort study. Several measures of exercise performance (6-min walk distance (6MWD)), lung function (forced vital capacity (FVC)) and quality of life (36-question short-form health survey (SF-36)) were assessed before and after pulmonary rehabilitation.

results50 patients were included in the study (24 with mild/moderate and 26 with severe/critical COVID-19). On admission, patients had a reduced 6MWD (mild: median 509 m, interquartile range (IQR) 426-539 m; severe: 344 m, 244-392 m), an impaired FVC (mild: 80%, 59-91%; severe: 75%, 60-91%) and a low SF-36 mental health score (mild: 49 points, 37-54 points; severe: 39 points, 30-53 points). Patients attended a median (IQR) 100% (94-100%) of all provided pulmonary rehabilitation sessions. At discharge, patients in both subgroups improved in 6MWD (mild/moderate: +48 m, 35-113 m; severe/critical: +124 m, 75-145 m; both p<0.001), FVC (mild/moderate: +7.7%, 1.0-17.8%, p=0.002; severe/critical: +11.3%, 1.0-16.9%, p<0.001) and SF-36 mental component (mild/moderate: +5.6 points, 1.4-9.2 points, p=0.071; severe/critical: +14.4 points, -0.6-24.5, p<0.001). No adverse event was observed.

conclusionOur study shows that pulmonary rehabilitation is a feasible, safe and effective therapeutic option in COVID-19 patients independent of disease severity.

Identifiers

PMID34095290
PMCPMC7957293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.