Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34095264›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

A Brief History in Cardiac Regeneration, and How the Extra Cellular Matrix May Turn the Tide.

Atze van der Pol, Carlijn V C Bouten

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stem Cell Therapy against Ischemic Heart Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Atze van der PolEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Carlijn V C BoutenEindhoven University of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue homeostasis is perturbed by stressful events, which can lead to organ dysfunction and failure. This is particularly true for the heart, where injury resulting from myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease can result in a cascading event ultimately ending with the loss of functional myocardial tissue and heart failure. To help reverse this loss of healthy contractile tissue, researchers have spent decades in the hopes of characterizing a cell source capable of regenerating the injured heart. Unfortunately, these strategies have proven to be ineffective. With the goal of truly understanding cardiac regeneration, researchers have focused on the innate regenerative abilities of zebrafish and neonatal mammals. This has led to the realization that although cells play an important role in the repair of the diseased myocardium, inducing cardiac regeneration may instead lie in the composition of the extra cellular milieu, specifically the extra cellular matrix. In this review we will briefly summarize the current knowledge regarding cell sources used for cardiac regenerative approaches, since these have been extensively reviewed elsewhere. More importantly, by revisiting innate cardiac regeneration observed in zebrafish and neonatal mammals, we will stress the importance the extra cellular matrix has on reactivating this potential in the adult myocardium. Finally, we will address how we can harness the ability of the extra cellular matrix to guide cardiac repair thereby setting the stage of next generation regenerative strategies.

Indexed as

cardiac regenerationdevelopmental biologyextra cellular matrixheart failurestem cells

Identifiers

PMID34095264
PMCPMC8172606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.