ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2021
A Benchmark Environment for Neuromorphic Stereo Vision.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuromorphic Near-Sensor and In-Sensor Computing Enabled by Next-Generation Material-Based Sensors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Without neuromorphic hardware, artificial stereo vision suffers from high resource demands and processing times impeding real-time capability. This is mainly caused by high frame rates, a quality feature for conventional cameras, generating large amounts of redundant data. Neuromorphic visual sensors generate less redundant and more relevant data solving the issue of over- and undersampling at the same time. However, they require a rethinking of processing as established techniques in conventional stereo vision do not exploit the potential of their event-based operation principle. Many alternatives have been recently proposed which have yet to be evaluated on a common data basis. We propose a benchmark environment offering the methods and tools to compare different algorithms for depth reconstruction from two event-based sensors. To this end, an experimental setup consisting of two event-based and one depth sensor as well as a framework enabling synchronized, calibrated data recording is presented. Furthermore, we define metrics enabling a meaningful comparison of the examined algorithms, covering aspects such as performance, precision and applicability. To evaluate the benchmark, a stereo matching algorithm was implemented as a testing candidate and multiple experiments with different settings and camera parameters have been carried out. This work is a foundation for a robust and flexible evaluation of the multitude of new techniques for event-based stereo vision, allowing a meaningful comparison.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.