Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34095121›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Emerging Role of m

Godwin Sokpor, Yuanbin Xie, Huu P Nguyen, Tran Tuoc

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cocaine remodels mFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. mMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. mAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Epitranscriptomic Mechanism of Metal Toxicity and Carcinogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. NMDAR mediated dynamic changes in mScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. RNA Modifications and RNA Metabolism in Neurological Disease Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Godwin SokporDepartment of Human Genetics, Ruhr University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Yuanbin XieDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Huu P NguyenDepartment of Human Genetics, Ruhr University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Tran TuocDepartment of Human Genetics, Ruhr University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic modification of RNA affords proximal regulation of gene expression triggered by non-genomic or environmental changes. One such epitranscriptomic alteration in RNA metabolism is the installation of a methyl group on adenosine [N

Indexed as

clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–dCas13bcortical developmentm6A editingmRNA metabolismmRNA methylationN6-methyladenosine (m6A)neurological disorders

Identifiers

PMID34095121
PMCPMC8170044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.