Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34094971›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

XGBoost Classifier Based on Computed Tomography Radiomics for Prediction of Tumor-Infiltrating CD8

Jing Li, Zhang Shi, Fang Liu, Xu Fang, Kai Cao, Yinghao Meng, Hao Zhang, Jieyu Yu, Xiaochen Feng, Qi Li and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Understanding the Conundrum of Pancreatic Cancer in the Omics Sciences Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and radiological picture of the tumor.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  13. Association between radiomics features of DCE-MRI and CD8Pathology oncology research : POR · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jing LiDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhang ShiDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Fang LiuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xu FangDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Kai CaoDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yinghao MengDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jieyu YuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaochen FengDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qi LiDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yanfang LiuDepartment of Pathology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Li WangDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hui JiangDepartment of Pathology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jianping LuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Chengwei ShaoDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yun BianDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study constructed and validated a machine learning model to predict CD8 MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, 184 PDAC patients were randomly assigned to a training dataset (n =137) and validation dataset (n =47). All patients were divided into CD8

resultsThe cut-off value of the CD8

conclusionsWe developed a CT-based XGBoost classifier to extrapolate the infiltration levels of CD8

Indexed as

CD8 positive T lymphocytescontrast-enhanced computed tomography imagespancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaprognosisradiomics

Identifiers

PMID34094971
PMCPMC8170309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.