Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34094824›Full record

ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2021

CAR-T cells: Early successes in blood cancer and challenges in solid tumors.

Hassan Dana, Ghanbar Mahmoodi Chalbatani, Seyed Amir Jalali, Hamid Reza Mirzaei, Stephan A Grupp, Eloah Rabello Suarez, Catarina Rapôso, Thomas J Webster

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Use of CD19-targeted immune modulation to eradicate AAV-neutralizing antibodies.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  14. The role of exosomes in bladder cancer immunotherapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. A new era of cancer immunotherapy: vaccines and miRNAs.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Hassan DanaCancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 13145-158, Iran.
Ghanbar Mahmoodi ChalbataniDepartment of Medical Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran.
Seyed Amir JalaliDepartment of Immunology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1985717434, Iran.
Hamid Reza MirzaeiDepartment of Medical Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran.
Stephan A GruppDivision of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Eloah Rabello SuarezCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Santo André, SP 09210-580, Brazil.
Catarina RapôsoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP 13083-871, Brazil.
Thomas J WebsterDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USMotamed Cancer Institute · IRNortheastern University · USTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal do ABC · BR

Funding

Project 3: Combinatorial and gene-editing approaches to enhance the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy of multiple myeloma.P01CA214278 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Joseph Anthony Fraietta · 2017 to 2026
$26.8M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA214278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New approaches to cancer immunotherapy have been developed, showing the ability to harness the immune system to treat and eliminate cancer. For many solid tumors, therapy with checkpoint inhibitors has shown promise. For hematologic malignancies, adoptive and engineered cell therapies are being widely developed, using cells such as T lymphocytes, as well as natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells, and potentially others. Among these adoptive cell therapies, the most active and advanced therapy involves chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, which are T cells in which a chimeric antigen receptor is used to redirect specificity and allow T cell recognition, activation and killing of cancers, such as leukemia and lymphoma. Two autologous CAR-T products have been approved by several health authorities, starting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017. These products have shown powerful, inducing, long-lasting effects against B cell cancers in many cases. In distinction to the results seen in hematologic malignancies, the field of using CAR-T products against solid tumors is in its infancy. Targeting solid tumors and trafficking CAR-T cells into an immunosuppressive microenvironment are both significant challenges. The goal of this review is to summarize some of the most recent aspects of CAR-T cell design and manufacturing that have led to successes in hematological malignancies, allowing the reader to appreciate the barriers that must be overcome to extend CAR-T therapies to solid tumors successfully.

Indexed as

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)Genetic engineeringImmunotherapyT cell therapy

Identifiers

PMID34094824
PMCPMC8144892
OpenAlexW3095051727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.