ArticleHealth and technology2021
Digital scribe utility and barriers to implementation in clinical practice: a scoping review.
Article in Health and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Health Care: A Systematic Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Patients Can Administer Mobile Audio Recordings to Increase Knowledge in Advanced Prostate Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2024Trial
- Determinants of AI Scribe Adoption in Allied Health: Mixed Methods Study Guided by the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model for Behavior Change.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Ambient Voice Technology in the National Health Service in England: Protocol for a Phase 2 Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- The Use of Ambient Dictation Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Spaces in Surgery: A Scoping Review.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Narrative Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Review
- Impacts of human and digital scribes on improving physician wellness and reducing administrative burden: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Appropriateness and utility of a clinical decision support system at the digital front door.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Documentation: A Review of Emerging Capabilities and the Ongoing Need for Human Oversight.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Digital Transformation of Rural, Regional, and Remote Australian Hospitals: A Pragmatic Strategy for Introducing AI.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
- AI-Powered Documentation for Mental Health Providers: Retrospective Observational Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Transforming clinical documentation with ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes: a narrative review of technology, impact, and implementation.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Performance, acceptability, and impact of ambient listening scribe technology in an outpatient context: a mixed methods trial evaluation.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- The Current State of Digital Scribes in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- The use of ambient voice technology (AVT) for clinician-patient consultations in healthcare practice: A rapid systematic scoping review.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Meeting the challenges of electronic health record (EHR) optimization.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Compassionate primary care training and practice in the digital technology sphere: a scoping review protocol.Canadian medical education journal · 2025Article
- Review
- The Emergence of Applied Artificial Intelligence in the Realm of Value Based Musculoskeletal Care.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic health records SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-021-00568-0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.