ReviewCureus2021
Patient and Family Engagement During Challenging Times: What Works and What Does Not?
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early Intervention for Children With Developmental Disabilities and Their Families via Telehealth: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Preferences for Prenatal Care Among Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiment Studies.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Slipping Through the Chasm of Multicenter Hand-offs-Rare Incidence of Nintedanib Induced Renal Failure: Case Report.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2026Article
- Patient-Centered Healthcare: From Patient Experience to Human Experience.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2024Article
- Family engagement in the care of infectious patients in intensive care units: A hybrid concept analysis.Nursing open · 2024Review
- Leveraging an Experience-Based Codesign Approach to Improve the Inpatient Food Service Experience.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2023Article
- Improving Emergency Department Patient Experience Through an Organizational Values-Aligned Standardized Behavioral Model.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2023Article
- Improving patient experience by implementing an organisational culture model.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A paradigm shift towards enhanced strategies to effectively engage patients and families in delivering safe and high-quality healthcare services was observed during recent times, particularly in the last decade. Immediately prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic, the tri-institutional global healthcare quality reports from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, World Bank Group, and Lancet Global Health Commission reported the patient and family engagement measures used globally, highlighting the variations across the regions of the world. Through a pandemic for more than a year now, we aim to present the key lessons learned from practices and strategies to proactively engage patients and families. These strategies may continue to be implemented in the post-Covid-19 pandemic era to improve patient and family-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.