Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34094720›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2021

Classifying Multi-Level Stress Responses From Brain Cortical EEG in Nurses and Non-Health Professionals Using Machine Learning Auto Encoder.

Ashlesha Akella, Avinash Kumar Singh, Daniel Leong, Sara Lal, Phillip Newton, Roderick Clifton-Bligh, Craig Steven Mclachlan, Sylvia Maria Gustin, Shamona Maharaj, Ty Lees and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Znet: Deep Learning Approach for 2D MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ashlesha AkellaFEIT, School of Computer ScienceAustralian Artificial Intelligence Institute, University of Technology Sydney Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia.
Avinash Kumar SinghFEIT, School of Computer ScienceAustralian Artificial Intelligence Institute, University of Technology Sydney Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia.
Daniel LeongFEIT, School of Computer ScienceAustralian Artificial Intelligence Institute, University of Technology Sydney Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia.
Sara LalNeuroscience Research Unit, School of Life SciencesUniversity of Technology Sydney Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia.
Phillip NewtonCentre for Cardiovascular and Chronic CareUniversity of Technology Sydney Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia.
Roderick Clifton-BlighDepartment of EndocrinologyRoyal North Shore HospitalThe University of Sydney Sydney NSW 2006 Australia.
Craig Steven MclachlanCentre for Healthy Futures, Health VerticalTorrens University Australia, Pyrmont Campus Pyrmont NSW 2009 Australia.
Sylvia Maria GustinSchool of PsychologyUniversity of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Australia.
Shamona MaharajNeuroscience Research Unit, School of Life SciencesUniversity of Technology Sydney Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia.
Ty LeesEdna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research CenterPennsylvania State University State College PA 16801 USA.
Zehong CaoInformation and Communication Technology (ICT)University of Tasmania Hobart TAS 7005 Australia.
Chin-Teng LinFEIT, School of Computer ScienceAustralian Artificial Intelligence Institute, University of Technology Sydney Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMental stress is a major problem in our society and has become an area of interest for many psychiatric researchers. One primary research focus area is the identification of bio-markers that not only identify stress but also predict the conditions (or tasks) that cause stress. Electroencephalograms (EEGs) have been used for a long time to study and identify bio-markers. While these bio-markers have successfully predicted stress in EEG studies for binary conditions, their performance is suboptimal for multiple conditions of stress.

methodsTo overcome this challenge, we propose using latent based representations of the bio-markers, which have been shown to significantly improve EEG performance compared to traditional bio-markers alone. We evaluated three commonly used EEG based bio-markers for stress, the brain load index (BLI), the spectral power values of EEG frequency bands (alpha, beta and theta), and the relative gamma (RG), with their respective latent representations using four commonly used classifiers.

resultsThe results show that spectral power value based bio-markers had a high performance with an accuracy of 83%, while the respective latent representations had an accuracy of 91%.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyHumansMachine LearningStress, PsychologicalAutoencoderelectroencephalogramstress classificationsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID34094720
PMCPMC8172183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.