ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2021
A retrospective surveillance of the prophylactic antibiotics for debridement surgery in burn patients.
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Affecting Quality of Life in Post-Burn Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Indonesia.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2025Article
- Infection and Burn Injury.European burn journal · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burn injury is trauma with a high risk of infection. A method that can be used to prevent and decrease the incidence of infection and accelerate wound healing is debridement. The use of prophylactic antibiotics was considered in debridement to minimize surgical site infection. This study's objective was to characterize the usage of prophylactic antibiotics for debridement in burn patients, including the selection, dose, and route of administration. The second objective was to quantitatively calculate the use of prophylactic antibiotics using ATC/DDD. This was a retrospective study in burn patients admitted to the Dr. Soetomo Hospital's burn unit between 2017 and 2020. Ninety burn patients meet the inclusion criteria enrolled in this study. There were eight prophylactic antibiotics for debridement in this study. Only four from eight antibiotics met the guidelines for prophylactic antibiotics before surgery. All prophylactic antibiotics were given intravenously. The most common prophylactic antibiotics were cefazolin (39%) and followed by ceftazidime (31%) and ceftriaxone (11%). Ceftazidime, cefoperazone, amikacin, and meropenem were used as therapeutic antibiotics to treat burn infection and continued as prophylactic before debridement surgery. Cefazolin and ceftriaxone were the most antibiotics that comply their dose with the guideline. The total of DDD/100 operations was 6.23 and cefazolin was the highest consumed, 3.10 DDD/100 operations. The mortality rate in our study was 33%. For those who survived, there was a significant correlation between % TBSA and length of stay also debridement frequency. Our study concluded there was a difference between daily practice in the hospital and in the guidelines. Improvements were needed to use prophylactic antibiotics more precisely regarding quantity and choice of the type of antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34094701PMC8166663W3165939366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.