Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34094599›Full record

ArticleRadiology research and practice2021

4DCT Scanning Technique for Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Scoping Review.

Steven Raeymaeckers, Maurizio Tosi, Johan De Mey

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. World journal of nuclear medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 4DCT Differentiation of Parathyroid Adenoma: A Case Report.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven RaeymaeckersUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Jette 1090, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0822-1919
Maurizio TosiUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Jette 1090, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-8675
Johan De MeyUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Jette 1090, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3601-3212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective4DCT for the detection of (an) enlarged parathyroid(s) is a commonly performed examination in the management of primary hyperparathyroidism. Protocols are often institution-specific; this review aims to summarize the different protocols and explore the reported sensitivity and specificity of different 4DCT protocols as well as the associated dose. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature study was independently conducted by two radiologists from April 2020 until May 2020 using the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) database. Articles were screened and assessed for eligibility. From eligible studies, data were extracted to summarize different parameters of the scanning protocol and observed diagnostic attributes.

resultsA total of 51 articles were included and 56 scanning protocols were identified. Most protocols use three (

conclusionMany different 4DCT scanning protocols for the detection of parathyroid adenomas exist in the literature. The number of phases does not appear to affect sensitivity or specificity. A triphasic approach, however, seems preferable, as three patterns of enhancement of parathyroid adenomas are described. Bolus tracking could help to reduce the variability of enhancement. Sensitivity and specificity also do not appear to be affected by other scan parameters like tube voltage or tube current. To keep the effective dose within limits, scanning at a lower fixed tube current seems preferable. Lowering tube voltage from 120 kV to 100 kV may yield similar image contrast but would also help lower the dose.

Identifiers

PMID34094599
PMCPMC8163538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.