Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34094270›Full record

ArticleChemical science2020

Challenging the Ostwald rule of stages in mechanochemical cocrystallisation.

Luzia S Germann, Mihails Arhangelskis, Martin Etter, Robert E Dinnebier, Tomislav Friščić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Chemical science · 2022
    Article
  11. Time-Resolved In Situ Monitoring of Mechanochemical Reactions.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luzia S GermannMax Planck Institute for Solid State Research Heisenbergstr. 1 70569 Stuttgart Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1760-5842
Mihails ArhangelskisDepartment of Chemistry, McGill University 801 Sherbrooke St. W. H3A 0B8 Montreal Canada luzia.germann@mail.mcgill.ca tomislav.friscic@mcgill.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-3108
Martin EtterDeutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY) Notkestraße 85 22607 Hamburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5183-3585
Robert E DinnebierMax Planck Institute for Solid State Research Heisenbergstr. 1 70569 Stuttgart Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-2113
Tomislav FriščićDepartment of Chemistry, McGill University 801 Sherbrooke St. W. H3A 0B8 Montreal Canada luzia.germann@mail.mcgill.ca tomislav.friscic@mcgill.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3921-7915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanochemistry provides an efficient, but still poorly understood route to synthesize and screen for polymorphs of organic solids. We present a hitherto unexplored effect of the milling assembly on the polymorphic outcome of mechanochemical cocrystallisation, tentatively related to the efficiency of mechanical energy transfer to the milled sample. Previous work on mechanochemical cocrystallisation has established that introducing liquid or polymer additives to milling systems can be used to direct polymorphic behavior, leading to extensive studies how the amount and nature of grinding additive affect reaction outcome and polymorphism. Here, focusing on a model pharmaceutical cocrystal of nicotinamide and adipic acid, we demonstrate that changes to the choice of milling media (

Identifiers

PMID34094270
PMCPMC8162427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.