Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34094201›Full record

ReviewChemical science2020

Catalytic enantioselective construction of vicinal quaternary carbon stereocenters.

Feng Zhou, Lei Zhu, Bo-Wen Pan, Yang Shi, Yun-Lin Liu, Jian Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Skeletal Reorganization of Cycloalkylamines Into Angular Azatetracyclic Scaffolds.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Enantioselective synthesis of chiral BCPs.Organic chemistry frontiers : an international journal of organic chemistry · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Feng ZhouShanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Molecular Therapeutics and New Drug Development, East China Normal University Shanghai 200062 P. R. China fzhou@chem.ecnu.edu.cn jzhou@chem.ecnu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6729-1311
Lei ZhuSchool of Chemistry and Materials Science, Hubei Engineering University Hubei 432000 P. R. China Lei.zhu@hbeu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4399-1855
Bo-Wen PanSchool of Pharmaceutical, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Guiyang 550002 P. R. China.
Yang ShiSchool of Pharmaceutical, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Guiyang 550002 P. R. China.
Yun-Lin LiuSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University Guangzhou 510006 P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-9885
Jian ZhouShanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Molecular Therapeutics and New Drug Development, East China Normal University Shanghai 200062 P. R. China fzhou@chem.ecnu.edu.cn jzhou@chem.ecnu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-6735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review summarizes the advances in the catalytic enantioselective construction of vicinal quaternary carbon stereocenters, introduces major synthetic strategies and discusses their advantages and limitations, highlights the application of known protocols in the total synthesis of natural products, and outlines the synthetic opportunities.

Identifiers

PMID34094201
PMCPMC8162142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.