Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34094181›Full record

ArticleChemical science2020

Melting temperature measurement and mesoscopic evaluation of single, double and triple DNA mismatches.

Luciana M Oliveira, Adam S Long, Tom Brown, Keith R Fox, Gerald Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Non-linear Hamiltonian models for DNA.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. A pH and MgACS omega · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luciana M OliveiraDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 31270-901 Belo Horizonte MG Brazil gweberbh@gmail.com +55 31 3409 5600 +55 31 3409 6616.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0300-5232
Adam S LongSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton Life Sciences Building 85 Southampton SO17 1BJ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7826-4060
Tom BrownDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6538-3036
Keith R FoxSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton Life Sciences Building 85 Southampton SO17 1BJ UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-7315
Gerald WeberDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 31270-901 Belo Horizonte MG Brazil gweberbh@gmail.com +55 31 3409 5600 +55 31 3409 6616.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-1571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike the canonical base pairs AT and GC, the molecular properties of mismatches such as hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions are strongly dependent on the identity of the neighbouring base pairs. As a result, due to the sheer number of possible combinations of mismatches and flanking base pairs, only a fraction of these have been studied in varying experiments or theoretical models. Here, we report on the melting temperature measurement and mesoscopic analysis of contiguous DNA mismatches in nearest-neighbours and next-nearest neighbour contexts. A total of 4032 different mismatch combinations, including single, double and triple mismatches were covered. These were compared with 64 sequences containing all combinations of canonical base pairs in the same location under the same conditions. For a substantial number of single mismatch configurations, 15%, the measured melting temperatures were higher than the least stable AT base pair. The mesoscopic calculation, using the Peyrard-Bishop model, was performed on the set of 4096 sequences, and resulted in estimates of on-site and nearest-neighbour interactions that can be correlated to hydrogen bonding and base stacking. Our results confirm many of the known properties of mismatches, including the peculiar sheared stacking of tandem GA mismatches. More intriguingly, it also reveals that a number of mismatches present strong hydrogen bonding when flanked on both sites by other mismatches. To highlight the applicability of our results, we discuss a number of practical situations such as enzyme binding affinities, thymine DNA glycosylase repair activity, and trinucleotide repeat expansions.

Identifiers

PMID34094181
PMCPMC8163305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.