Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34094179›Full record

ArticleChemical science2020

Carbon nanodots revised: the thermal citric acid/urea reaction.

Volker Strauss, Huize Wang, Simon Delacroix, Marc Ledendecker, Pablo Wessig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Photodynamic effect of carbon dots and aluminum chloride phthalocyanine against skin cancer: modulation by an autophagy inducer.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. NHNano-micro letters · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Volker StraussDepartment of Colloid Chemistry, Max-Planck-Institute of Colloids and Interfaces Am Mühlenberg 1 14476 Potsdam Germany volker.strauss@mpikg.mpg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-6841
Huize WangDepartment of Colloid Chemistry, Max-Planck-Institute of Colloids and Interfaces Am Mühlenberg 1 14476 Potsdam Germany volker.strauss@mpikg.mpg.de.
Simon DelacroixDepartment of Colloid Chemistry, Max-Planck-Institute of Colloids and Interfaces Am Mühlenberg 1 14476 Potsdam Germany volker.strauss@mpikg.mpg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0632-8627
Marc LedendeckerDepartment of Technical Chemistry, Technical University Darmstadt Alarich-Weiss-Straße 8 64287 Darmstadt Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-401X
Pablo WessigInstitute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25 D-14476 Potsdam Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-0399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Luminescent compounds obtained from the thermal reaction of citric acid and urea have been studied and utilized in different applications in the past few years. The identified reaction products range from carbon nitrides over graphitic carbon to distinct molecular fluorophores. On the other hand, the solid, non-fluorescent reaction product produced at higher temperatures has been found to be a valuable precursor for the CO

Identifiers

PMID34094179
PMCPMC8163031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.