Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34094149›Full record

ReviewChemical science2020

Progress, highlights and perspectives on NiO in perovskite photovoltaics.

Diego Di Girolamo, Francesco Di Giacomo, Fabio Matteocci, Andrea Giacomo Marrani, Danilo Dini, Antonio Abate

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Heterojunction Devices Fabricated from SprayedNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Key Strategies on CuNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Doping Free and Amorphous NiOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  15. Recent Developments in Upscalable Printing Techniques for Perovskite Solar Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diego Di GirolamoDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering. University of Naples Federico II Pzz.le Vincenzo Tecchio 80 Naples 80125 Italy diego.digirolamo91@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-1138
Francesco Di GiacomoC.H.O.S.E.- Center for Hybrid and Organic Solar Energy, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata Via del Politecnico 1 00133 Rome Italy.
Fabio MatteocciC.H.O.S.E.- Center for Hybrid and Organic Solar Energy, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata Via del Politecnico 1 00133 Rome Italy.
Andrea Giacomo MarraniDepartment of Chemistry, University of Rome La Sapienza Pzz.le Aldo Moro 5 Rome 00185 Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3203-9642
Danilo DiniDepartment of Chemistry, University of Rome La Sapienza Pzz.le Aldo Moro 5 Rome 00185 Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5005-4187
Antonio AbateDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering. University of Naples Federico II Pzz.le Vincenzo Tecchio 80 Naples 80125 Italy diego.digirolamo91@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of NiO based perovskite solar cells has recently hit a record 22.1% with a hybrid organic-inorganic perovskite composition and a PCE above 15% in a fully inorganic configuration was achieved. Moreover, NiO processing is a mature technology, with different industrially attractive processes demonstrated in the last few years. These considerations, along with the excellent stabilities reported, clearly point towards NiO as the most efficient inorganic hole selective layer for lead halide perovskite photovoltaics, which is the topic of this review. NiO optoelectronics is discussed by analysing the different doping mechanisms, with a focus on the case of alkaline and transition metal cation dopants. Doping allows tuning the conductivity and the energy levels of NiO, improving the overall performance and adapting the material to a variety of perovskite compositions. Furthermore, we summarise the main investigations on the NiO/perovskite interface stability. In fact, the surface of NiO is commonly oxidised and reactive with perovskite, also under the effect of light, thermal and electrical stress. Interface engineering strategies should be considered aiming at long term stability and the highest efficiency. Finally, we present the main achievements in flexible, fully printed and lead-free perovskite photovoltaics which employ NiO as a layer and provide our perspective to accelerate the improvement of these technologies. Overall, we show that adequately doped and passivated NiO might be an ideal hole selective layer in every possible application of perovskite solar cells.

Identifiers

PMID34094149
PMCPMC8163100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.