Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093957›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2021

Algorithm to guide re-exposure to penicillin in allergic pregnant women with syphilis: Efficacy and safety.

Juliana Fóes Bianchini Garcia, Marcelo Vivolo Aun, Antonio Abilio Motta, Mariana Castells, Jorge Kalil, Pedro Giavina-Bianchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Oxaliplatin desensitization for ovarianGynecologic oncology reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliana Fóes Bianchini GarciaClinical Immunology and Allergy Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Vivolo AunClinical Immunology and Allergy Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Antonio Abilio MottaClinical Immunology and Allergy Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana CastellsDivision of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jorge KalilClinical Immunology and Allergy Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Giavina-BianchiClinical Immunology and Allergy Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational syphilis is underdiagnosed and undertreated, leading to stillbirth, prematurity, low birthweight, neonatal death, and congenital syphilis. Most patients who label as allergic to penicillin are misdiagnosed.

objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of an algorithm to guide re-exposure to penicillin in pregnant women with syphilis and reporting allergy to the antibiotic.

methodsWe performed a prospective study assessing pregnant women with syphilis and labeled as allergic to penicillin. Based on clinical history, patients were divided in two groups: high-risk and low-risk to penicillin allergy. Low-risk patients with negative skin testing and negative serum specific IgE to penicillin underwent drug provocation test. The remaining patients underwent desensitization.

resultsNinety-one patients were enrolled. Allergy to penicillin was confirmed in 7.69% of pregnant women with syphilis and clinical history of allergy to penicillin; in all cases the diagnosis was made through intradermal testing, which predicted 100% of the breakthrough reactions observed during rapid drug desensitization (p < 0.001). Risk stratification based on the initial clinical reaction and skin testing to guide penicillin re-introduction through drug challenge or desensitization was safe (97.8%) and effective (97.8%).

conclusionWe developed and showed the efficacy and safety of an algorithm to guide re-exposure to penicillin in pregnant women with syphilis and labeled as allergic to this drug. Intradermal test is an excellent biomarker in the diagnosis of immediate hypersensitivity reaction to penicillin and to predict breakthrough reaction during rapid drug desensitization. Further studies may confirm the greater safety of the intravenous protocol compared to the oral protocol.

Indexed as

AlgorithmAnaphylaxisBenzathine penicillinCongenital syphilisDesensitizationGestational syphilisImmediate hypersensitivity reactionsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34093957
PMCPMC8165434
OpenAlexW3164993808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.