ArticleOncology letters2021
Apatinib plus ifosfamide and etoposide for relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma: A retrospective study in two centres.
Article in Oncology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Apatinib plus ifosfamide and etoposide versus ifosfamide and etoposide in patients with advanced osteosarcomas (OAIE/PKUPH-sarcoma 11): a randomized phase II study.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- sB7-H3 as a prognostic biomarker in osteosarcoma: insights into clinical outcomes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Extracellular Vesicles in Osteosarcoma: Mechanisms, Diagnostics and Therapeutic Applications.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Systemic strategies for osteosarcoma: advances and future directions.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Advancements in Osteosarcoma Therapy: Overcoming Chemotherapy Resistance and Exploring Novel Pharmacological Strategies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Anlotinib combined with penpulimab in the treatment of advanced adult thoracic spinal osteosarcoma: a case report.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- MAPK-targeted therapies in non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor soft tissue sarcomas: current landscape and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Fruquintinib-Based Treatment in Patients with Refractory Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma after Developing Resistance to Several TKIs: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Nano-Based Drug Delivery Systems: Potential Developments in the Therapy of Metastatic Osteosarcoma-A Narrative Review.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Targeted therapy for osteosarcoma: a review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Expression and Clinical Significance of Various Checkpoint Molecules in Advanced Osteosarcoma: Possibilities for Novel Immunotherapy.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Apatinib plus chemotherapy for non-metastatic osteosarcoma: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in sarcoma treatment.Oncology letters · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For osteosarcoma that progresses following first-line chemotherapy, prognosis remains poor although anti-angiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been verified to prolong progression-free survival. Apatinib has led to positive responses in the treatment of refractory osteosarcoma. However, it demonstrates only short-lived activity, and the disease control rate of musculoskeletal lesions is worse compared with that of pulmonary lesions. This treatment failure has been partly overcome by the addition of ifosfamide and etoposide (IE). The present study retrospectively compared the activity of apatinib + IE in relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma in two sarcoma centres in China. The included patients had received a combination of apatinib 500 mg (orally) daily and the IE regimen (n=33) between June 3 2017 and July 17 2020. The tumour burden was considerable in these patients: 16/33 (48.5%) Patients had lung and musculoskeletal lesions, and 31/33 (93.9%) patients had progressed to two lines of therapies at baseline. With a median follow-up duration of 28.4 [interquartile range (IQR), 16.1-38.3] months, 21/33 (63.6%) patients had objective responses, and the median event-free survival was 11.4 (IQR, 6.7-18.4) months. The median overall survival time was 19.8 (IQR, 13.1-30.6) months. At the last follow-up, 16/33 patients had tumour downstaging, and all lesions had been completely resected. For osteosarcoma with multiple sites of metastasis, apatinib + IE demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity and delayed disease progression in patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma after failure of chemotherapy. This combination with manageable toxicity deserves further investigation in prospective trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.