Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093773›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2021

Apatinib plus ifosfamide and etoposide for relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma: A retrospective study in two centres.

Lu Xie, Jie Xu, Xin Sun, Xiaowei Li, Kuisheng Liu, Xin Liang, Zuli Zhou, Hongqing Zhuang, Kunkun Sun, Yiming Wu and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Targeted therapy for osteosarcoma: a review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lu XieMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Jie XuMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Xin SunMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Xiaowei LiMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Kuisheng LiuMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Xin LiangMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Zuli ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Hongqing ZhuangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Kunkun SunPathology Department, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Yiming WuEndocrinology Department, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Jin GuDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Wei GuoMusculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Peking University · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CNPeking University Shougang Hospital · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For osteosarcoma that progresses following first-line chemotherapy, prognosis remains poor although anti-angiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been verified to prolong progression-free survival. Apatinib has led to positive responses in the treatment of refractory osteosarcoma. However, it demonstrates only short-lived activity, and the disease control rate of musculoskeletal lesions is worse compared with that of pulmonary lesions. This treatment failure has been partly overcome by the addition of ifosfamide and etoposide (IE). The present study retrospectively compared the activity of apatinib + IE in relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma in two sarcoma centres in China. The included patients had received a combination of apatinib 500 mg (orally) daily and the IE regimen (n=33) between June 3 2017 and July 17 2020. The tumour burden was considerable in these patients: 16/33 (48.5%) Patients had lung and musculoskeletal lesions, and 31/33 (93.9%) patients had progressed to two lines of therapies at baseline. With a median follow-up duration of 28.4 [interquartile range (IQR), 16.1-38.3] months, 21/33 (63.6%) patients had objective responses, and the median event-free survival was 11.4 (IQR, 6.7-18.4) months. The median overall survival time was 19.8 (IQR, 13.1-30.6) months. At the last follow-up, 16/33 patients had tumour downstaging, and all lesions had been completely resected. For osteosarcoma with multiple sites of metastasis, apatinib + IE demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity and delayed disease progression in patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma after failure of chemotherapy. This combination with manageable toxicity deserves further investigation in prospective trials.

Indexed as

apatinibetoposideifosfamidemetastasisosteosarcomarelapsed or refractory

Identifiers

PMID34093773
PMCPMC8170178
OpenAlexW3165591285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.