ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2020
Use of nebulised N-acetylcysteine as a life-saving mucolytic in intensive care: A case report.
Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preclinical assessment of inhalational subacute safety of nebulized MP-171 (BromAc®).BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Disorders in Cystic Fibrosis That Affect Emergency Procedures-A Case Report and Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Acute phencyclidine inhalation injury in the emergency department: a rare cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome and alveolar haemorrhage.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 for 85 Days in COVID-19 Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Lung Metastasis: A Case Report.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Future Trends in Nebulized Therapies for Pulmonary Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a case of critical airway obstruction secondary to a solid tracheal mucus plug in a patient with pneumonia. Following failed conventional mucolysis therapy, nebulised N-acetylcysteine acted as a life-saving mucolytic, and prevented imminent cardiorespiratory arrest. Use of oral N-acetylcysteine as a mucolytic has been long established within respiratory medicine in managing chronic airway disease, but is rarely utilised in critically ill or mechanically ventilated patients due to the lack of comparative studies in literature. A 28-year-old female presented to the emergency department with shortness of breath and a productive cough. She was six weeks post-partum with no past medical history. Initial management for a community acquired pneumonia with type 1 respiratory failure included intensive care admission, antibiotics, fluid therapy and bronchodilators. The patient acutely deteriorated 48 h after admission becoming unresponsive and severely hypoxaemic. Intubation did not achieve ventilation, and subsequent direct bronchoscopy revealed a thick, solid, obstructing tracheal mucus plug, superior to the carina. It was resistant to aspiration despite the use of saline flushes, chest physiotherapy and bronchodilators and the bronchoscope could not pass it. N-acetylcysteine, administered via the bronchoscopic port, caused sufficient mucolysis to enable removal of the thick mucus cast, enabling ventilation and gas exchange. Such resistant mucus plugging is a rare cause of failed ventilation, with limited therapeutic options. Here, the unlicensed and rarely reported use of nebulised N-acetylcysteine was a life-saving mucolytic, allowing removal of the obstructing plug and re-establishing ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.