Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093728›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2020

A survey examining the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on adult intensive care units across the UK.

Ema Swingwood, Lyvonne Tume, Fiona Cramp

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06491017 (Effects of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation With Optimized Settings on Suctioned Wet Mucus Volume During Invasive Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06491017 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation With Optimized Settings on Suctioned Wet Mucus Volume During Invasive Ventilation

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRan2026 to 2028Enrolled26ConditionsMucus Retention, Mechanical Ventilation ComplicationArmsMI-E Intervention protocol, Standard MI-E setting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of mechanical insufflation exsufflation and manual techniques in an intubated adult with COVID-19 positioned in prone-A case study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ema SwingwoodUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-6748
Lyvonne TumeSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Fiona CrampFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
University of the West of England · GBUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite potential benefits, it is not known how widely physiotherapists use mechanical insufflation-exsufflation devices on UK adult intensive care units. This survey aimed to describe mechanical insufflation-exsufflation use in UK adult intensive care units.

methodsCross-sectional electronic survey of physiotherapists working in a permanent post on adult intensive care units.

resultsOne hundred and sixty-six complete surveys were available for analysis, reflecting a diverse geographical spread. Nearly all (98%; 163/166) clinicians had access to mechanical insufflation-exsufflation. The estimated frequency of use varied, with the majority reporting weekly or monthly use (52/163, 32%; 50/163, 31%, respectively). Nearly all clinicians (99%) used mechanical insufflation-exsufflation with extubated patients. In contrast, around half of respondents (86/163, 53%) used mechanical insufflation-exsufflation with intubated patients, with a range of perceived barriers reported.

conclusionsMechanical insufflation-exsufflation devices are widely available on UK adult intensive care units, with use more common in extubated patients. Barriers to mechanical insufflation-exsufflation use in the intubated population warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Cough assistcough augmentationmechanical ventilationphysiotherapyweaning

Identifiers

PMID34093728
PMCPMC8142094
OpenAlexW2972206093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.