Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093675›Full record

ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2021

Comparative angiotomographic study of swine vascular anatomy: contributions to research and training models in vascular and endovascular surgery.

Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes, Rosa Helena de Figueiredo Chaves, Ismari Perini Furlaneto, Emanuelle de Matos Rodrigues, Flávia Beatriz Araújo de Albuquerque, Jacob Hindrik Antunes Smit, Carolina Pinheiro de Oliveira, Simone de Campos Vieira Abib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Translation of Animal Study to Human: In Silico Based Development of Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Sensor.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira GóesCentro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA, Curso de Medicina, Belém, PA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-9539
Rosa Helena de Figueiredo ChavesCentro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA, Curso de Medicina, Belém, PA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8694-689X
Ismari Perini FurlanetoCentro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA, Curso de Medicina, Belém, PA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9941-0162
Emanuelle de Matos RodriguesCentro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA, Curso de Medicina, Belém, PA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-0699-4790
Flávia Beatriz Araújo de AlbuquerqueCentro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA, Curso de Medicina, Belém, PA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-4401-3893
Jacob Hindrik Antunes SmitCentro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA, Curso de Medicina, Belém, PA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9499-5210
Carolina Pinheiro de OliveiraCentro Universitário do Estado do Pará - CESUPA, Curso de Medicina, Belém, PA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2662-2794
Simone de Campos Vieira AbibUniversidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Programa de Ciência Cirúrgica Interdisciplinar, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9675-0380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedium and large animal models allow researchers to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiovascular procedures in systems that resemble human anatomy and can be used to simulate scenarios for training purposes. Although porcine models have been used extensively, many physiological and anatomical features remain unknown or only superficially described.

objectivesTo describe the normal porcine vascular anatomy on computed tomography scans, compare it to human vascular anatomy, and discuss the application of porcine models for open and endovascular procedures.

methodsThree male Landrace pigs underwent computed tomography. The vascular anatomy of the neck, thorax, abdomen, and limbs was analyzed and described; relevant similarities and differences between porcine and human vascular anatomies and the implications for vascular procedures in pigs are highlighted.

resultsThe carotid territory, aortic arch, and terminal aorta branches all show marked differences in pigs compared to their human counterparts. Compressions of both left renal and common iliac veins were detected, analogous to those seen in human Nutcracker and May-Thurner syndromes. Vascular measurements (diameters, lengths, and angles) of several different porcine territories are presented.

conclusionsThe data presented should be useful for planning preclinical trials and basic research and for refining surgical training using porcine models in vascular fields.

Indexed as

anatomy, comparativeblood vesselscomputed tomography angiographyendovascular procedurespigsvascular surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID34093675
PMCPMC8147709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.