Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093652›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2021

A Sight on Single-Cell Transcriptomics in Plants Through the Prism of Cell-Based Computational Modeling Approaches: Benefits and Challenges for Data Analysis.

Aleksandr Bobrovskikh, Alexey Doroshkov, Stefano Mazzoleni, Fabrizio Cartenì, Francesco Giannino, Ulyana Zubairova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Identification of Key Differentially Expressed Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aleksandr BobrovskikhLaboratory of Plant Growth Biomechanics, Institute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexey DoroshkovLaboratory of Plant Growth Biomechanics, Institute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia.
Stefano MazzoleniDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio CartenìDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Francesco GianninoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Ulyana ZubairovaLaboratory of Plant Growth Biomechanics, Institute of Cytology and Genetics Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell technology is a relatively new and promising way to obtain high-resolution transcriptomic data mostly used for animals during the last decade. However, several scientific groups developed and applied the protocols for some plant tissues. Together with deeply-developed cell-resolution imaging techniques, this achievement opens up new horizons for studying the complex mechanisms of plant tissue architecture formation. While the opportunities for integrating data from transcriptomic to morphogenetic levels in a unified system still present several difficulties, plant tissues have some additional peculiarities. One of the plants' features is that cell-to-cell communication topology through plasmodesmata forms during tissue growth and morphogenesis and results in mutual regulation of expression between neighboring cells affecting internal processes and cell domain development. Undoubtedly, we must take this fact into account when analyzing single-cell transcriptomic data. Cell-based computational modeling approaches successfully used in plant morphogenesis studies promise to be an efficient way to summarize such novel multiscale data. The inverse problem's solutions for these models computed on the real tissue templates can shed light on the restoration of individual cells' spatial localization in the initial plant organ-one of the most ambiguous and challenging stages in single-cell transcriptomic data analysis. This review summarizes new opportunities for advanced plant morphogenesis models, which become possible thanks to single-cell transcriptome data. Besides, we show the prospects of microscopy and cell-resolution imaging techniques to solve several spatial problems in single-cell transcriptomic data analysis and enhance the hybrid modeling framework opportunities.

Indexed as

bioimagingcell-based computational modelshybrid modeling approachmodeling softwareplant morphogenesissingle-cell transcriptomicsspatial gene expression mapssystems biology

Identifiers

PMID34093652
PMCPMC8176226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.