Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093633›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Guideline-Adherent Clinical Validation of a Comprehensive 170-Gene DNA/RNA Panel for Determination of Small Variants, Copy Number Variations, Splice Variants, and Fusions on a Next-Generation Sequencing Platform in the CLIA Setting.

Theresa A Boyle, Ashis K Mondal, Daryoush Saeed-Vafa, Sudha Ananth, Pankaj Ahluwalia, Ravi Kothapalli, Alka Chaubey, Evans Roberts, Dahui Qin, Anthony M Magliocco and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Single-cell Characterization of the Cellular Landscape of Acral Melanoma Identifies Novel Targets for Immunotherapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa A BoyleDepartment of Pathology and Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Ashis K MondalDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Daryoush Saeed-VafaDepartment of Pathology and Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Sudha AnanthDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Pankaj AhluwaliaDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Ravi KothapalliDepartment of Pathology and Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Alka ChaubeyDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Evans RobertsDepartment of Pathology and Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Dahui QinDepartment of Pathology and Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Anthony M MaglioccoDepartment of Pathology and Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Amyn M RojianiDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Ravindra KolheDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Augusta University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the clinical validation of a targeted DNA and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay at two clinical molecular diagnostic laboratories. This assay employs simultaneous DNA and RNA analysis of all coding exons to detect small variants (single-nucleotide variants, insertions, and deletions) in 148 genes, amplifications in 59 genes, and fusions and splice variants in 55 genes. During independent validations at two sites, 234 individual specimens were tested, including clinical formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens, reference material, and cell lines. Samples were prepared using the Illumina TruSight Tumor 170 (TST170) kit, sequenced with Illumina sequencers, and the data were analyzed using the TST170 App. At both sites, TST170 had ≥98% success for ≥250× depth for ≥95% of covered positions. Variant calling was accurate and reproducible at allele frequencies ≥5%. Limit of detection studies determined that inputs of ≥50 ng of DNA (with ≥3.3 ng/μl) and ≥50 ng RNA (minimum of 7 copies/ng) were optimal for high analytical sensitivity. The TST170 assay results were highly concordant with prior results using different methods across all variant categories. Optimization of nucleic acid extraction and DNA shearing, and quality control following library preparation is recommended to maximize assay success rates. In summary, we describe the validation of comprehensive and simultaneous DNA and RNA-based NGS testing using TST170 at two clinical sites.

Indexed as

clinicalDNA variantsnext-generation sequencingoncologyRNA variantstargeted panelvalidation

Identifiers

PMID34093633
PMCPMC8172991
OpenAlexW3161028172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.