Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093451›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Responses of Soil Fungal Communities to Lime Application in Wheat Fields in the Pacific Northwest.

Chuntao Yin, Daniel C Schlatter, Duncan R Kroese, Timothy C Paulitz, Christina H Hagerty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chuntao YinDepartment of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Daniel C SchlatterWheat Health, Genetics and Quality Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture - Agriculture Research Service, Pullman, WA, United States.
Duncan R KroeseDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Adams, OR, United States.
Timothy C PaulitzDepartment of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Christina H HagertyDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Adams, OR, United States.
Oregon State University · USQuality Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liming is an effective agricultural practice and is broadly used to ameliorate soil acidification in agricultural ecosystems. Our understanding of the impacts of lime application on the soil fungal community is scarce. In this study, we explored the responses of fungal communities to liming at two locations with decreasing soil pH in Oregon in the Pacific Northwest using high-throughput sequencing (Illumina MiSeq). Our results revealed that the location and liming did not significantly affect soil fungal diversity and richness, and the impact of soil depth on fungal diversity varied among locations. In contrast, location and soil depth had a strong effect on the structure and composition of soil fungal communities, whereas the impact of liming was much smaller, and location- and depth-dependent. Interestingly, families Lasiosphaeriaceae, Piskurozymaceae, and Sordariaceae predominated in the surface soil (0-7.5 cm) and were positively correlated with soil OM and aluminum, and negatively correlated with pH. The family Kickxellaceae which predominated in deeper soil (15-22.5 cm), had an opposite response to soil OM. Furthermore, some taxa in Ascomycota, such as Hypocreales,

Indexed as

fungal community analysismicrobial communitysoil acidificationsoil healthwheat

Identifiers

PMID34093451
PMCPMC8174452
OpenAlexW3164744671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.