Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093155›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2021

Differential Contributions of Inhibitory Subnetwork to Visual Cortical Modulations Identified

William H Nesse, Zahra Bahmani, Kelsey Clark, Behrad Noudoost

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prefrontal activity sharpens spatial sensitivity of extrastriate neurons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William H NesseDepartment of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Zahra BahmaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Kelsey ClarkDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Behrad NoudoostDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
University of Utah · USTarbiat Modares University · IR

Funding

University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PAUL STEVEN BERNSTEIN · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
Understanding the prefrontal mechanisms involved in the enhancement and maintenance of visual signals.R01EY026924 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NOUDOOST, BEHRAD · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
Sensory recruitment by working memory: neuronal basis and neural circuitryR01NS113073 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NOUDOOST, BEHRAD · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Understanding the neural basis for recruitment of visual areas by working memoryR01MH121435 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NOUDOOST, BEHRAD · 2020 to 2020
$191k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026924NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121435NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrastriate visual neurons show no firing rate change during a working memory (WM) task in the absence of sensory input, but both αβ oscillations and spike phase locking are enhanced, as is the gain of sensory responses. This lack of change in firing rate is at odds with many models of WM, or attentional modulation of sensory networks. In this article we devised a computational model in which this constellation of results can be accounted for via selective activation of inhibitory subnetworks by a top-down working memory signal. We confirmed the model prediction of selective inhibitory activation by segmenting cells in the experimental neural data into putative excitatory and inhibitory cells. We further found that this inhibitory activation plays a dual role in influencing excitatory cells: it both modulates the inhibitory tone of the network, which underlies the enhanced sensory gain, and also produces strong spike-phase entrainment to emergent network oscillations. Using a phase oscillator model we were able to show that inhibitory tone is principally modulated through inhibitory network gain saturation, while the phase-dependent efficacy of inhibitory currents drives the phase locking modulation. The dual contributions of the inhibitory subnetwork to oscillatory and non-oscillatory modulations of neural activity provides two distinct ways for WM to recruit sensory areas, and has relevance to theories of cortical communication.

Indexed as

excitatory-inhibitory balancelocal field oscillationsphase lockingvisual responsesworking memory

Identifiers

PMID34093155
PMCPMC8173146
OpenAlexW3161553905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.