ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2021
The Effect of Focal Damage to the Right Medial Posterior Cerebellum on Word and Sentence Comprehension and Production.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognition in cerebellar disorders: What's in the profile? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Cerebellar Contributions to Cognitive Affective Function and Postural Tremor in Neurological Wilson's Disease.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Semantic and Syntactic Language Differences Associated with theJournal of neurolinguistics · 2026Article
- Established and Emergent Reading Skills in Adults with Cerebellar Stroke: Evidence of Phonological Alexia.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- Frontal, temporal, cerebellar changes link to sepsis survivors' cognitive issues: A resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Cognitive Potential Characteristics and Brain Network Dynamics in Patients with Acute Cerebellar Ischemic Stroke: Insights from P300 and Moving Dipoles.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- Integrating Radiomics and Lesion Mapping for Cerebellar Mutism Syndrome Prediction.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Bilingual Logopenic Primary Progressive Aphasia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2024Article
- Dissociating Cerebellar Regions Involved in Formulating and Articulating Words and Sentences.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- The Cerebellum Is Sensitive to the Lexical Properties of Words During Spoken Language Comprehension.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Language and the Cerebellum: Structural Connectivity to the Eloquent Brain.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Resting-state functional alterations in patients with brain arteriovenous malformations involving language areas.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- The cerebellum and cognitive neural networks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Altered Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity Associated With Early Verbal Fluency Decline After Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Functional imaging studies of neurologically intact adults have demonstrated that the right posterior cerebellum is activated during verb generation, semantic processing, sentence processing, and verbal fluency. Studies of patients with cerebellar damage converge to show that the cerebellum supports sentence processing and verbal fluency. However, to date there are no patient studies that investigated the specific importance of the right posterior cerebellum in language processing, because: (i) case studies presented patients with lesions affecting the anterior cerebellum (with or without damage to the posterior cerebellum), and (ii) group studies combined patients with lesions to different cerebellar regions, without specifically reporting the effects of right posterior cerebellar damage. Here we investigated whether damage to the right posterior cerebellum is critical for sentence processing and verbal fluency in four patients with focal stroke damage to different parts of the right posterior cerebellum (all involving Crus II, and lobules VII and VIII). We examined detailed lesion location by going beyond common anatomical definitions of cerebellar anatomy (i.e., according to lobules or vascular territory), and employed a recently proposed functional parcellation of the cerebellum. All four patients experienced language difficulties that persisted for at least a month after stroke but three performed in the normal range within a year. In contrast, one patient with more damage to lobule IX than the other patients had profound long-lasting impairments in the comprehension and repetition of sentences, and the production of spoken sentences during picture description. Spoken and written word comprehension and visual recognition memory were also impaired, however, verbal fluency was within the normal range, together with object naming, visual perception and verbal short-term memory. This is the first study to show that focal damage to the right posterior cerebellum leads to language difficulties after stroke; and that processing impairments persisted in the case with most damage to lobule IX. We discuss these results in relation to current theories of cerebellar contribution to language processing. Overall, our study highlights the need for longitudinal studies of language function in patients with focal damage to different cerebellar regions, with functional imaging to understand the mechanisms that support recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.